Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09230-06
Original file (09230-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
         DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
         BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
         2 NAVY ANNEX
         WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 DJC
Docket No. 9230-06
31 January 2007




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by c~c Memo 1610 G-l dtd 4 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all of ficial records. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.





Sincerely,

ROBERT D . Z l SALMAN
 Acting Executive Director
Enclosure





                                             UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
                            MARINE  CORPS RECRUITING COMMAND 3280 RUSSELL ROAD
                   QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103
                                                                                                  
                                                                                                   IN REPLY REFER TO
                                                                                                    1610
                                                                                                   G-l
          4 Jan 2007
MEMORANDUM FOR   THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:    BCNR DOCKET NO.

1.       The Marine Corps Recruiting Command does not concur with the advisory opinion provided in the reference. Academic failure is not a reason to reduce enlistment contract by one year.
         
         2.       Point of contact at this Command is at DSN 278-9403      or commercial (703) 784-9403.


By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01096-07

    Original file (01096-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1096-07 19 Apr 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00933-07

    Original file (00933-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    933-07 12 Apr 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06856-05

    Original file (06856-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05060-06

    Original file (05060-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. We were asked to provide an advisory opinion on Staff Sergeant request to have his relief for the good of service removed from his OMPF.2. Per the reference and review of the attached OMPF, there is not enough evidence to support the removal of this information.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04365-07

    Original file (04365-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 4 May 2007, a copy of which is attached. Per MCO 1610.llc, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with three members present met on 2 May 2007 to consideration...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00767-01

    Original file (00767-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATE6 MARINE CORPS 3280 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-8 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 2 5 JAN 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07244-01

    Original file (07244-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS RECRUITING COMMAND 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08418-07

    Original file (08418-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,Executive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS3280 RUSSELL ROADQUANTICO, VA 22134-5103 MMER/PERBSEP 072007MEMOR.ANDtJN FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06619-02

    Original file (06619-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB in finding that the contested section K (reviewing officer (RO) marks and comments) of the fitness report for 1 June 2000 to 31 May 2001 should stand. 1 8 20~ MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF LIEUTENANT COLONEL USMC Ref: (a) (b) LtCo MC0 's DD Form...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09701-06

    Original file (09701-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 26 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per MCO l610.llC, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with three members present, met on 18 October 2006 to...