Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00005-08
Original file (00005-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 BAN
 Docket No. 00005-08
24 March 2008


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 U SC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on March 24, 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memo 1430 Ser 811/208 of 29 Feb 08, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director


Enclosure






DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

                                    
                                    1430
                                                                                                    Ser 811/208
                                                                                                   29 Feb 08
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
 Via:     PERS-31C
Subj:    BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:     (a) SNN’s D D Form 149 dtd 9 Aug 07
                   (b) BUPERSINST 1430.16E
En cl :    (1) BCNR File
1.       In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.
2.       The petitioner is requesting validation of her March 2005 Cycle 187 Navy-Wide Advancement Examination.
3.       Upon verification with the Naval Education and Training Professional Development and Technology Center (NETPDTC), it was discovered that the petitioner’s previous command Fleet Area Control and Surveillance Facility (FACSFAC) San Diego, CA did not identify her as an Early Promote (EP) Time-in-Rate (TIR) waiver for advancement Cycle 187.
4.       In accordance with reference (b), personnel who are authorized EP TIR waivers should be identified in the transmittal letter to NETPDTC when the answer sheets are forwarded for grading. Failure to identify an eligible member results in invalidation of the examination because of insufficient TIR. An EP TIR waiver is granted at the discretion of the CO/OIC and is not considered automatic for every Sailor who could qualify.
5.       In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as is.
6. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.


Division Director
 Enlisted Career Progression

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06548-08

    Original file (06548-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materia] submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable gtatutes, regulations and policies. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner's request. This is Jan advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Cdrrection of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02628-09

    Original file (02628-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum tc reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07737-06

    Original file (07737-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7737-06 1 Nov 06This is in reference o your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00077-08

    Original file (00077-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material -submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/198 of 27 Feb 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13251-09

    Original file (13251-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/049 of 20 January 2010. This is an advisory memorandum...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09732-05

    Original file (09732-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9732-05 8 Mar 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02265-09

    Original file (02265-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on &8 dune 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is’ on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10587-07

    Original file (10587-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/057 of 16 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05064-09

    Original file (05064-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. However, because the command failed to submit a message withdrawing his recommendation to NPC and NETPDTC, prior to his advancement date, the Petitioner started to receive E-5 pay effective 16 August 2008,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12258-08

    Original file (12258-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They reason that although the command erred in allowing Petitioner to take the September 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam for I1T3, Petitioner was not eligible to take the exam per BUPERINST 1430.16F which states that...