Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11187-07
Original file (11187-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                 2 NA VY ANNEX    -
                                                      WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
 Docket No. 11187-07
24 March 2008


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.
A three—member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on March 24, 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPc memo 1430 Ser 811/205 of 28 Feb 08, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records, consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
                  -
                 
                 



                  Sincerely,


         W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
         



Enclosure


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                                                      MILLINGTON TN 38055•0000
                                    1430
                                                                                                    Ser 811/205
                                                                                                   28 Feb 08
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD -
 Via:     PERS-31C
Subj:    BCNR PETITION ICO

Ref:     (a) SNN’s DD Form 149 dtd 29 Nov 07
End:     (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.
2. The petitioner is requesting to adjust his E5 date of rank to the date he enlisted in the United States Navy, 12 July 2004, based on the paygrade held upon his discharge on 4 October 2003 from the United Stated Marine Corps.
3. Petitioner voluntarily enlisted in the United States Navy on
12 July 2004 for four years and extended this enlistment for an additional 12 months to complete five year obligation for the following guarantees: OSVET - Information Systems Technician School Guarantee (SG/IT) SEAL Challenge Program; RTC Great Lakes IL; Rate/paygrade SN/E3; and Enlistment bonus $8,000 for Special Operations.
4.       In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remains as is.
5.       This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.

Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10423-07

    Original file (10423-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10194-07

    Original file (10194-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/ of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12202-08

    Original file (12202-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval ~ record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06957-07

    Original file (06957-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. After a thorough review of petitioner’s service record it was discovered that the petitioner was advanced to AEM3c(T) on 1 December 1945 and was separated from active duty on 28 July 1946 as an AEM3c(T). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09999-07

    Original file (09999-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/034 of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04990-07

    Original file (04990-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In view of above it is not recommended the member DD-2l4 be changed to reflect BM3 or BMSN.5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00005-08

    Original file (00005-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    00005-08 24 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on March 24, 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00077-08

    Original file (00077-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material -submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/198 of 27 Feb 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10587-07

    Original file (10587-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/057 of 16 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01413-08

    Original file (01413-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.