Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11177-07
Original file (11177-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DE
BOARD F

 

PARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 11177-07

3 September 2008

This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to
States Code,

 

A three-member panel of

Records, Sitting in exec
application on 3 Septemb
injustice were reviewed

regulations and procedur
Board. Documentary mate
your application, togeth
thereof, your naval reco
and policies. In additi
Opinions furnished by He
May and 11 June 2008, an
copies of which are attac

After careful and consciée
record, the Board found t
insufficient to establish
error or injustice. Int
concurred with the commen
and HQMC letter. Accordi
The names and votes of th
upon request.

It is regretted that the
favorable action cannot b
Board reconsider its deci
evidence or other matter
In this regard, it is imp
presumption of regularity

the provisions of title 10 of the United

section 1552.

he Board for Correction of Naval

tive session, considered your

r 2008. Your allegations of error and
n accordance with administrative

S applicable to the proceedings of this
ial considered by the Board consisted of
r with all material submitted in support
d and applicable statutes, regulations
n, the Board considered the advisory
dquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) dated 12

a letter from HQMC dated 29 July 1999,

hed.

ntious consideration of the entire

hat the evidence submitted was

the existence of probable material
his connection the Board substantially
ts contained in the advisory opinions
ngly, your application has been denied.

e members of the panel will be furnished
ircumstances of your case are such that

° taken. You are entitled to have the
ion upon submission of new and material

not previously considered by the Board.

pbrtant to keep in mind that a

attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09932-09

    Original file (09932-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    These requests were denied on 2 September 2004. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion from the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Career Management Team (CMT), dated 24 July 2008 with enclosures, and the reports of the HQMC Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 September 2008 and 8 September 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05363-08

    Original file (05363-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09812-08

    Original file (09812-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. The Board found the adverse combat fitness report cited in the advisory opinion made your selection definitely unlikely, even if your record not only had been purged of the contested report whose removal has been directed, but also included the later filed combat fitness report for 2 May to 19 August 2007. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10175-08

    Original file (10175-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regarding the recommendation, in paragraphs 4.b.ii and 5 of the JAM5 advisory opinion, to amend the commanding officer’s/RO’s letter of 4 May 2006 (among the ericlosures to the HQMC routing sheet dated 10 October 2006) by removing the words “for his civilian conviction,” the Board noted that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00196-08

    Original file (00196-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    196-08 11 March 2008 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04433-99

    Original file (04433-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has removed your adverse fitness report for 17 October to 9 November 1998. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting restoration of your drill instructor military occupational specialty (MOS) or your special duty assignment (SDA) pay. The memorandum will...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08257-08

    Original file (08257-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05058-08

    Original file (05058-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2008. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion, except to note your request was not for remedial consideration for promotion to master sergeant, but adjusting the date of rank and effective date of your promotion to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Master Sergeant Selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07768-07

    Original file (07768-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5~OO JSRDocket No:7768-0727 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested, in effect, that the package reflecting your relief for the good of the service from drill instructor duty, except the Commanding General approval letter dated 9 March 2006, be removed from your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02021-99

    Original file (02021-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by HQMC, dated 24 May 1999, and the Marine Corps Recruiting Command, dated 12 July 1999, copies of which are attached. a. Petitioner seeks removal from his records of all reference to his conviction by summary court-martial. Accordingly, we recommend relief be granted to the extent of ordering the removal from Petitioner's records of all references to his conviction at summary court-martial and all performance evaluations or...