Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07768-07
Original file (07768-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5~OO



 JSR
 Docket No:7768-07
 27 March 2008







This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
You requested, in effect, that the package reflecting your relief for the good of the service from drill instructor duty, except the Commanding General approval letter dated 9 March 2006, be removed from your Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), or as a second preference, that this package be transferred from the “Other Commendatory-Derogatory” folder of your OMPF to the “Service-Miscellaneous” folder, and that your rebuttal of 20 January 2006 be added to the package.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 3 October 2007, 5 December 2007 and 14 January 2008, and the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 21 February 2008, copies of which are attached. The Board also considered your letter dated 6 March 2008 with enclosures.









After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions dated 5 December 2007, 14 January 2008 and 21 February 2008 in concluding that filing and retaining the contested material in your OMPF did not violate Depot Order P1300.5A, Marine Corps Order P1070.12K, the Privacy Act of 1974 or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. You may submit to HQMC (MMSB-20) a request that the package be transferred to the “Service-Miscellaneous” folder and that your rebuttal be added to it. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
         -
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01143-08

    Original file (01143-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2008. The Board found the absence, from your fitness report for 4 December 2004 to 4 April 2005 (not on file in your record), of any reference to the counseling entry in question or the matter it addresses does not establish you had no behavior warranting formal counseling. The Board found the contested counseling entry was not a Marine Corps Separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04878-06

    Original file (04878-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CMC’s decision to include Applicant’s adverse material in her OMPF reflects the fact that the misconduct was substantiated in Applicant’s case. Paragraph 4002 of MCO P5800.16, Marine Corps Manual for Legal Administration (LEGADMINMAN) provides information and guidance concerning reports of officer misconduct; paragraph 4004 of the LEGADMINMAN provides information and guidance concerning formal report of officer nonjudicial punishment (NJP) or disposition of allegations of- misconduct. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03870-07

    Original file (03870-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner contends the report should be removed because his rebuttal to the reporting senior’s comments are missing.3. This Headquarters located the petitioner’s rebuttal to the report and added the addendum page to his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); therefore, the Board found the report administratively correct and procedurally complete. Finally, the Board found that the petitioner provided no substantial or justifiable information to warrant removing the report.b.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09018-02

    Original file (09018-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL ROAD VIRQINIA QUANTICO, 22134-5103 NAVY CORPS IN REPLY REFER TO: 1070 MIFD IIEC 3 Z@ MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: F STAFF...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07499-01

    Original file (07499-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 January 2002. Staff Sergeant application with supporting documents has been ncerning his request for removal of the sensitive medical documentation contained in his official military personnel files (OMPF). Staff medical documentation contained in his OMPF.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03855-08

    Original file (03855-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. The Board found no requirement for a page 11 entry, regarding your promotion revocation, in MCO P1400.32C, the applicable version of the Enlisted Promotions Manual (this requirement appears in paragraph 1204.5 of MCO P1400.32D, dated 11 May 2006). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06

    Original file (01685-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04433-08

    Original file (04433-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions from the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Manpower Information Operations, Manpower Management Information Systems Division (MIO), dated 16 April 2008 with enclosure, and the HQMC Military Law Branch, Judge Advocate Division (JAM3), dated 28 April 2008, and the report of the HQMC Performance...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7775 13

    Original file (NR7775 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was then selected by the FY 2012 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, convened on 17 April 2012, and he was promoted to gunnery sergeant with a date of rank and effective date of 1 December 2012. d. Enclosure (4) shows that the in zone percentage selected for the FY 2006 Staff Sergeant Selection Board was 62.2. e. Enclosure (5) reflects that the HQMC Performance Evaluation Review Board directed removing Petitioner's fitness report for 1 April to 2 November 2006, which documented the later...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02041-01

    Original file (02041-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) for removal of the record and 02 USMC He petitioned the porting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990731. requests removal of his failures of selection. Performance Evaluation Review Board He failed selection He petitioned the (PERB) for removal of the rting Senior fitness report of 980831 to 990630. equests removal of his failures of selection. Head, Personnel Management Support was removed from the OMPF on 5 October emphatically states that the...