DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docke
24 No
This is in reference to your application for corred
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 1d
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of
Records, sitting in executive session, considered jy
application on 13 November 2008. Your allegations
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administ
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceé
Board. Documentary material considered by the Boaz
your application, together with all material submit
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
and policies.
aT
No: 10320-07
ember 2008
rtion of your
of the United
Naval
yOUr
of error and
rative
dings of this
d consisted of
ted in support
regulations
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitte
insufficient to establish the existence of probabl
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reser
1994 and entered on extended active duty. Your red
you were absent without authority from 30 October t
1994. The absence was recorded as time lost on the
you were issued on 8 June 1997, which you signed an
The Board did not accept your unsubstantiated conte
effect that you were not absent without authority d
period in question. Accordingly, your application H
denied. The names and votes of the members of the
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your cas
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of ne
evidence or other matter not previously considered
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind tha
presumption of regularity attaches to all official
Consequently; when applying for a correction of an
d
was
material
ve on 7 June
ord shows that
Oo 1 November
DD Form 214
d initialed.
ntion to the
uring the
as been
panel will be
are such that
to have the
w and material
by the Board.
ta
records.
official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12857-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 9 November 1994, you received your second NUP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty and were awarded restriction and extra duty for 30 days and a $388 forfeiture of pay, which was suspended for six months. In this regard, the Board determined that a personal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10030-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 March 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 22 November 1995, you were honorably...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06213-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2001. The Board noted that it has no authority to take any action which would affect the finality of your conviction by special court-martial, and that its authority in this case is limited to correcting your record as a matter of clemency. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2527-13
On 17 May 1994, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09362-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02160-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Concerning your request for a change in the reenlistment code, the Board was aware that an RE-4 reenlisted code is the only authorized code when an individual is discharged because they are a conscientious objector. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07975-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08470-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2008. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty on or before 16 October 1998, or you're your condition was incurred in or aggravated by your service in the Navy Reserve, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04435-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your case was heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB), which voted three to one in favor of an administrative honorable discharge due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10675-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board found those factors insufficient to warrant removal of the three periods of unauthorized absence from your record.