DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .
CRS
Docket No: 10575-08
3 August 2009
This is in reference to your request for further consideration of
your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to
the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your.
application on 22 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 April 1992.
On 24 February 1994 you commenced a period of unauthorized
absence that terminated on 28 February 1994, You were also
absent without authority on 12 March and 5 June 1994.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall
record of service, and the unsubstantiated contention that you
were present for duty during the three periods of unauthorized
‘absence shown in your record. The Board found those factors
insufficient to warrant removal of the three periods of
unauthorized absence from your record. Accordingly, your.
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it igs important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to ail official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00512-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. After appellate review, on 7 February 1994, you received the BCD.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12004-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Although the discharge processing documents ate not filed in your record, the Board presumed that you requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial for an extended period of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07430-97
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03870-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01495-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2009. Therefore, you were recommended for separation with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to your misconduct and conviction at a SPCM. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03551-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05744-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Although your proficiency and conduct mark averages met the requirement for an honorable discharge, given your disciplinary actions, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05838-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2009. You were so discharged on 1 February 1996, upon the completion of the appellate review of your conviction and sentence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8362 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service and request to have a Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) issued prior Docket No.NR08362-13 .to your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03696-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...