Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08470-07
Original file (08470-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE
Docket No. 08470-07
17 June 2008

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the

United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 June 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from
29 November 1994 to 16 October 1998, when you were transferred

to the Individual Ready Reserve. You were considered fit for
duty at that tip. You transferred to the Selected Reserve on 26
October 1999. On 19 January 2000, you complained of a one-month
history of weakness. You were ultimately given a diagnosis of
renal failure with chronic glomerulonephritis. The Department
of Veterans Affairs granted you service connection for that
condition effective 3 March 2000, after resolving doubt in your
favor, that the condition , although not diagnosed within one-
year of your release from active duty, was manifest to a degree
of disability of at least 10% during the one-year presumptive
period.

Your contention that your disability was diagnosed while you
were on active duty in the Navy Reserve is not substantiated. In
the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit
for duty on or before 16 October 1998, or you're your condition

was incurred in or aggravated by your service in the Navy
Reserve, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action
in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Lo Nae

W. DEAN P
Executive D or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10460-07

    Original file (10460-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You then served in the Navy Reserve until 14 September 1991, when you were honorably discharged from the service and not recommended for reenlistment pursuant to the approved findings of an administrative discharge board (ADB). You completed reports of medical history on those dates in which you falsely denied that you had ever been discharged from military service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00307-07

    Original file (00307-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 5 May 1998, and were assigned to a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11325-07

    Original file (11325-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered application on 13 November 2008. You honorable discharge certificate on 16 January 2005, expiration of your statutory service obligation. You he Marine characterized ned a reentry gible or is incomplete, y action ive duty as a ere issued an upon the le discharge arrant honorable.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05715-01

    Original file (05715-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The PEB determined that you were fit for duty, notwithstanding those diagnoses, and the Chief of Naval Personnel was requested to take appropriate action to continue you on active duty. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08506-06

    Original file (08506-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00606-07

    Original file (00606-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you were released from active duty on 13 June 1980 and transferred to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10898-07

    Original file (10898-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting, in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02149-08

    Original file (02149-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2008. You were released from active duty on 17 March 2006, and discharged from the USMCR on 6 December 2006 at the expiration of your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07322-07

    Original file (07322-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08366-00

    Original file (08366-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TO SUPPORT HIS REQUEST THE MEMBER PRESENTED TESTIMONY AND COPIES OF HIS V.A. THE RECORD DOCUMENTS THAT THE MEMBER HAD CHRONIC LEFT SHOULDER KNEE, AND FOOT PAIN THAT LIMITED HIS ACTIVITIES DUE TO THE ABOVE DIAGNOSES. THE TDRL EVALUATION INDICATES THAT SINCE PLACEMENT ON THE TDRL THE MEMBER HAS UNDERGONE A LEFT ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR IN OCTOBER 1998 BUT CONTINUES TO HAVE CHRONIC SHOULDER PAIN.