DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 06481~07
17 June 2008
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 June 2008. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
. Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from
22 March to 22 October 1998, when you were discharged by reason
of a personality disorder, with a entry level separation, based
on the findings of a psychiatrist to whom you admitted having
traits consistent with a borderline personality disorder, to
include chronic suicidal ideation which dated back to age 13, as
well as a history of two suicide attempts. Although you
completed more than six months of service, you were not entitled
to a characterized discharge because separation processing was
commenced with the first 180 days of your service. Your
a pulmonary condition is not substantiated by the evidence of
record. ,
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were
unfit for service by reason of a physical disability that was
incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of service, or
that you were erroneously diagnosed with a personality disorder
and improperly discharged on that basis, there is no basis for
granting your request for correction of your record.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Wen ยง ;
W. DEAN Pr
Executive Oo
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00080-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08752-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07823-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09297-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05030-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful andconscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 21 June 1974. You were discharged from the Navy by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00140-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2009. Accordingly, and as RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to a Marine discharged by reason of a personality disorder, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04177-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 December 2002 at age 19. Nevertheless, the Board found that these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02730-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02786-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 2002 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 2 March...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00911-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changes to your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code because of your diagnosed personality disorder and nonrecommendation for retention or reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...