Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09355-07
Original file (09355-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEH
Docket No. 9355-07
10 Dec 07



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC memo 1133 Ser N32/ of 26 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application, and your request for a personal appearance before the Board, has been denied. The names and votes of the ~ of the panel will be furnished upon request.
iV~ is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.





Sincerely,
W. DEAN PF EIFFER
 Executive Director





Enclosure

         IN I     - I
1133
Ser N32/
 NOV 26 2007

From:    Commander, Navy Recruiting Command
To:      Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Subj:    BCNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:     (a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8G
End:     (1) BCNR Docket Nr. 09355-07
1.       Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1) . Per reference (a) , as stated in our previous advisory memorandum, the pay-grade determination was made through the Enlisted Community Manager and SNM is not approved for advanced pay-grade.
2.       This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only. Enclosure (1) is returned.




By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00141-07

    Original file (00141-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error r injustice. This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08005-07

    Original file (08005-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Upon further review, as provided in enclosure (1), and review of the member official service record_ was attach to the Selected Reserve Component as an SKSN/E3 and did participate in the February 2007 (Cycle 192) advancement examination and was selected for SK3/E4. Therefore, the member is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08558-06

    Original file (08558-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser N32/ of 20 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08323-01

    Original file (08323-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. N32/6110 of 20 November opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08019-06

    Original file (08019-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely, W. DEAN PFIEFFERExecutive DirectorEnclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 Integrity...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06226-01

    Original file (06226-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6226-01 27 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ilnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. your application on 27 November 200 in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07538-01

    Original file (07538-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01

    Original file (04237-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure the applicant was authorized to enlist in paygrade attend members must enlist in eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class school.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07090-01

    Original file (07090-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory your naval record and N32/06515 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06754-01

    Original file (06754-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...