Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06226-01
Original file (06226-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD  FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 6226-01
27 November 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

Ilnited States Code, section  

10 of the  

1552.

your application on 27 November 200  

in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered  
irijustice were reviewed 
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N32/6500 of 13 November
opinion furnished by NAVCRLJITCOM  
2001, a copy of which is attached.

. Your allegations of error and
1 

nlemorandum  1 133 Ser 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the  members of   the panel   will he 

upon  request.

filrnislied 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLlNGTON,TENNESSEE  

-7

REFERTO:

IN REPLY 

1133
N32 
Ser 
13 Nov 01

/6500

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR REQUEST ICO

(a)
(b)
Cc)

(1)

COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 
BUPERS
BUPERS

ltr 1130 Ser
ltr 1130 Ser

1130.8F
N132C4/22  OF 11
N132C4/9U97760

00

Jul
of 18 May 99

BCNR Docket Nr.  

06226-91

Cc), if frocked at the time of discharge,  

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
and 

1.
lb) 
request reenlistment in the frocked  
within six months of discharge and reenlisting in the previously
According to enclosure  
held rating.
reenlist within six months of discharge.

(l),  the applicant did not

paygrade  only if reenlisting

NAVETs  can

Per references (a),

2. Th
Correction of Naval Records

.s is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06207-01

    Original file (06207-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6207-01 27 November 2001 This is in provisions of title reference to your application for- correction of your naval record pursuant to the IO of the Ilnited States Code, section 1552. wert‘ reviewed in accordance wit panel of the three-mrmher A session, considered your iii_justice to the proceedings your application, applicable opinion furnished by copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05089-01

    Original file (05089-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or In this regard, it is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06326-01

    Original file (06326-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 6326-01 27 November 2001 in reference to your application This is provisions of title IO of the I liiitecl States for correction of your naval (lode, section 1552. record pursuant to the panel three-menlber the applic*ation A of session, considered your injustice were reviewed in accordance with to the proceedings your application, applicable statutes, regulations by opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-00

    Original file (04747-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4747-00 27 November 2001 This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the Ilnited States Code, section 1552. opinion furnished by 2001, a copy of which is attached. Non-prior service applicants will access onto active Applicants discharged from another service after less than paygrade E-l...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05694-01

    Original file (05694-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LP:dd_j J Dc?cket No: IS November 200 1 5694-01 This is in reference to provisions of‘ title IO your of the apl)lication llnitrtl St;ltcas Code, section 1552. fOr correction ot’ your naval rt’cord pursuant to the three-rnembcr panel ot‘ your application in ;iccorhncc with A consitlerctl reviewed proceedings of this application, applicable statutes, opinion furnished by a copy of which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06637-01

    Original file (06637-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06037-01

    Original file (06037-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    13oartl for panel of the (lorrection of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member session, considered your application on 27 November 200 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this tted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, atldi tion, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01

    Original file (04237-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure the applicant was authorized to enlist in paygrade attend members must enlist in eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class school.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05491-01

    Original file (05491-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N32/6502 of 30 October 2001, a n~emorantlum 133 Ser 1 conscienlious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the After careful and evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01649-00

    Original file (01649-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 1649-00 27 November 2001 This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the YOUI- application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the Ilniterl States Code, section 1552. your application on 27 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of supJ>ort thereof, your naval record and your application, applicable statutes, opinion...