Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09305-07
Original file (09305-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


S M W
 Docket No: 9305-07
30 May 2008






This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
On 10 December 2001, you enlisted in the Navy at age 23. On 16 June 2003, you were promoted to pay grade E-3. Based on the information currently contained in the record, it appears that you received three adverse performance evaluations during the period 16 July 2003 to 3 December 2005. On 18 January 2006, you were released from active duty under honorable conditions due to completion of required active service and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are released from active duty due to completion of required active service and fail to meet professional growth criteria. To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment, a member must be serving as a petty officer or in pay grade E-3 having passed an examination for advancement to pay grade E-4 and be currently recommended for advancement. Given your three consecutive adverse performance evaluations preceding your release from active duty, it appears that you were not recommended for advancement or
retention. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
 Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03300-01

    Original file (03300-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    recommended for advancement, an RE-4 reenlistment code was the only code that could be assigned. differently than others released from active duty under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 00171 12

    Original file (00171 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An individual separated in paygrade E-3 who fails to meet the above criteria may receive an RE-3R reenlistment code if he/she is recommended for advancement to paygrade E-4 at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08110-07

    Original file (08110-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code because of your disciplinary...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02930-02

    Original file (02930-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The instruction states, in part, as follows: To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment (including first enlistment in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02092-08

    Original file (02092-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code because of your disciplinary record which resulted in two NUPs, failure of professional growth criteria, and nonrecommendation for retention or reenlistment. Consequently, when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08436-07

    Original file (08436-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The instruction states, in part, as follows: To satisfy professional growth criteria for the first reenlistment...the member must be: (1) serving as a petty officer or, (2) serving in paygrade E-3 having passed an examination for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08499-06

    Original file (08499-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05212-01

    Original file (05212-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 15 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’ Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06642-10

    Original file (06642-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 July 1971, you were released from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3 and not recommended for retention.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07934-01

    Original file (07934-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 28 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on proceedi ngs of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment or who are not recommended for...