Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07464-07
Original file (07464-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG

Docket No: 7464-07
7 August 2008

 

: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: a ns OF NAVAL RECORD OF EX-CPL Mes vsycr,

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former member of the Marine Corps, filed an application with this

Board requesting that the reason for his discharge and the
be corrected.

related separation program designator (SPD)

2 wehbe Board, consisting of it a ih.
a reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and ™
stice on 29 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations,

determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material

considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

 
 

records,

The Board, having reviewed ali the facts of record pertaining

3.
finds as

to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that Petitioner's application was
not filed in a timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to
Waive the statute of limitations and consider the application on

its merits.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 November
1988. On 21 August 1992 he was released from active duty and
transferred to the Marine Corps Reserve in the grade of corporal.
At that time, he was assigned an RE-1A reenlistment code.

d. Petitioner affiliated with a reserve unit on 13 November
1996 and at that time extended his enlistment for 11 months.
He was honorably discharged on 21 October 1997. At that time, he
was assigned an SPD code of HKK which means that he was
discharged by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
e. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from
Headquarters Marine Corps which states as follows:

... On 3 October 1997 [Petitioner] was counseled for
illegal drug use, specifically THC. [He] was not
available for signature due to being absent from drill.
HKK1 is the proper separation code for drug abuse.
However, no documentation exists in [his] service
record or at the Personnel Management Support Branch to
support a separation code of HKK1.

... A review of [his] record does not show he was
administratively separated due to illegal drug abuse.
[He] should have been separated due to expiration of
contract on 21 October 1997.

... Based on the above, this Headquarters recommends
that [his] separation code be changed to MBK3...

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. Although it appears that he may have had a positive
urinalysis, it is clear that there was insufficient time before
the expiration of his enlistment to process him for discharge due
to drug abuse. Therefore, the Board agrees with the
recommendation contained in the advisory opinion that his record
should be corrected to show that he was discharged at the
expiration of his enlistment with an SPD of KBK3.

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future

reviewers will understand the reasons for the change in the
separation code.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 21 October 1997 he was assigned an SPD of KBK3 vice the HKK

SPD now of record.

b. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN \ GEORGE

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
\ Wag ‘
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dir

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00232

    Original file (MD02-00232.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00232 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020109, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. For SPD Code’s GKK1 and HKK1, the Narrative Reason for Separation is “MISCONDUCT” (Listed on page A-6 of MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug 95)SPD English Description GKK1 Drug abuse (with board)HKK1 Drug abuse (board required but waived)Characterization of service is written “HONORABLE”, “GENERAL ( UNDER HONORABLE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10740-05

    Original file (10740-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuable to the provisions of reference , Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed an appiicatjor 1 with this Board requesting that his Separation Program Designator (SPD) be changed.2 The Board consisting of Mr MrMsreviewedPetitioner’s a11egations of error and injustice on 8 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. NPC recommended that Petitioner’s record be corrected to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000101

    Original file (MD1000101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” However, the Board found that the administrative separation process,the determined characterization of service (Under Other Than Honorable Conditions), and narrative reason (Misconduct) were proper and correct due to the Applicant’s guilty plea, subsequent guilty finding during Commanding Officer’s NJP on 16 Feb 2000, and documentation in the Applicant’s service and administrative separation records.The NDRB will submit DD-214 correction recommendations to the Commandant of the Marine...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01251

    Original file (MD99-01251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.970319: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0730, 31Jan97 to 0825, 5Feb97 (5 days/surrendered). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00292

    Original file (MD03-00292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00292 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021204, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or under honorable conditions (general) and that the narrative reason be changed to pattern of misconduct or secretarial authority. Not appealed.891018: Vacate forfeiture awarded at Commanding Officer’s NJP dated 891005.891101: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. CA action 891225: Sentence approved...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00155

    Original file (MD02-00155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-Pvt, USMC Docket No. The only change from MCO P1900.16C is: “administrative” vice “admin”) GKK1 Misconduct-Drug abuse (with administrative discharge board)HKK1 Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived) Characterization of service is written “HONORABLE”, “UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)” or “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS”( See page 1-33 of MCO...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600683

    Original file (MD0600683.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 991005: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.991022: Commanding Officer, 2d Battalion, 6 th Marines, recommended that Applicant be discharged for misconduct due to drug abuse with a characterization of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 11 14_07_47 CDT 2000

    Petitioner’s three—member Administrative Discharge Board sat from 7 to 8 December, found unanimously that the allegation of drug use was substantiated, and recommended separation with a general (under On 15 October, the Attorney Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR),_APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF (FORMER) GUNNERY SERGEANT~!J~t~~J ~ S. MARINE CORPS honorable) characterization of service. Petitioner was 7~q~97 b. Board for Correction reviE-iof ~ the administrative recommended in...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00925

    Original file (MD01-00925.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00925 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010711, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. GKK1 Misconduct-Drug abuse (with administrative discharge board)HKK1 Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived) Characterization of service is written “HONORABLE”, “UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)” or “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS”( See page 1-33 of MCO P1900.16D, effective...

  • CG | BCMR | Alcohol and Drug Cases | 2005-128

    Original file (2005-128.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated April 5, 2006, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a former seaman (SN; pay grade E-3) who served a little more than one year in the Coast Guard, asked the Board to correct his record by upgrading his 1988 discharge (general, under honorable conditions) to honorable. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On November 7, 2005, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted an advisory opinion in which he adopted...