DE
BOAR
This is in reference ta
naval record pursuant #
oO
United States Code, sedt
A three-member panel of
Records, sitting in exe
application on 14 Augus
injustice were reviewed
regulations and procedur
Board. Documentary mate
of your application, tog
support thereof, your na
regulations and policies¢
IC
He
s
After careful and consci
record, the Board found
insufficient to establig
error or injustice. In
although you sustained a
career, and ultimately yx
Department of Veterans A
continued to perform you
you transferred to the R
report for the period 1
that you re-qualified in
period, and scored “exce
test (PRT). The report f
PARTMENT OF THE NAVY
P FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 07333-07
19 August 2008
your application for correction of your
the provisions of title 10 of the
10n, 2552.
the Board for Correction of Naval
utive session, considered your
2008. Your allegations of error and
in accordance with administrative
es applicable to the proceedings of this
rial considered by the Board consisted
ether with all material submitted in
val record and applicable statutes,
Do
entious consideration of the entire
that the evidence submitted was
h the existence of probable material
this regard, the Board found that
number of injuries during your naval
eceived disability compensation from the
ffairs for residuals thereof, you
r duties in an outstanding manner until
etired Reserve in 2004. Your fitness
October 2002-30 September 2003 indicates
diving and parachuting during that
ilent” on the SEAL physical readiness
pr the period ending on 30 September
2004 indicates that you scored “excellent” on the semi-annual
PRT during that period.
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were
unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your office, grade,
rank or rating by reag
unable to recommend a
Accordingly, your app
votes of the members
request.
It is regretted that t
that favorable action
the Board reconsider ij
material evidence or a
the Board.
a presumption of regul
Consequently, when app
naval record, the burd
existence of probable
In this regard,
on of physical disability, the Board was
y corrective action in your case.
ication has been denied. The names and
f the panel will be furnished upon
he circumstances of your case are such
cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
ts decision upon submission of new and
ther matter not previously considered by
it is important to keep in mind that
arity attaches to all official records.
lying for a correction of an official
en is on the applicant to demonstrate the
Material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03798-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 31 January 2004, you reenlisted in the Navy at age 21 after a prior period of honorable service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04514-97
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 19 September and 3 November 1997 and 20 May 1998 with reference (b), copies of which are attached. We cannot determine if the promotion recommendation is in accordance PRT regulations in effect at the time since or if the member could have been recommendation for promotion as it appears the member may have been out of two fitness reports. DSN MSC, USNR, f contact is LCD Pers-601,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07638-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 2010. On 24 July 2008, you were recommended for administrative separation due to weight control failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06607-05
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Thestatementof2sjuly2 006 from a chief petty officer who says he was the physical fitness assessment coordinator at the pertinent time did not persuade the Board either, as it was submitted two years after the fact; and it did not affirmatively state you passed the PRT The Board Particular...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08326-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During the period 16 March thru 7 December 2004, you successfully passed the PRT, however, you were not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01921-99
An RE-4 reenlistment code means that the individual is ineligible for reenlistment without prior approval from Commander, Naval Personnel Command. Absent evidence to the contrary, a presumption exists that action by the Navy to discharge you by reason of "failed physical standards" was both appropriate and proper. Since you received the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in the assigned reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02741-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ex Sheree of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08570-06
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three-member panel of the Boa d for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03513-00
The Petitioner was discharged from the U.S. Navy on 27 January 1998 after Petitioner was discharged he was medically evaluated and his case was reviewed by the Physical Evaluation Board. 17 years of active duty service. Subj: REQUEST OF FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE 9.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04366-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 17 June 2009 with enclosure and the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 June 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...