Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06607-05
Original file (06607-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR GORPECTEON OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON 0020370-5100

                                                               HD: hd
                                                                                 Docket No. 06607-05
                                                                                          10 August 2007




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, on 2 2March2007 Contifluedconsiderationon29Ma rc h 2007
its review 0 f 19 August 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies In addition, the Board considered the advisory Opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 1 4 November 2006, the memorandum for the record dated 27 March 2007 and the fax from the Board’s staff to you dated 30 March 2007, copies of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Concerning your performance evaluation report for 16 March 2004 to 15 March 2005, the Board noted theblocjc2o (“Physical Readiness”) data was irrelevant, as it reflected your most recent physical readiness test (PRT), which was conducted on2S October2004, rather than the one in question, which was conducted on4June2004. Thestatementof2sjuly2 006 from a chief petty officer who says he was the physical fitness assessment coordinator at the pertinent time did not persuade the Board either, as it was submitted two years after the fact; and it did not affirmatively state you passed the PRT The Board Particular lynotedyoudidflotresp dt therequest, reflected in the fax of 30 March 2007, that you provide additional information. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously co nsi dered by th e B oar d In this regard, it is important to keep that a pres um ption of regularityatt~ch~ 5 to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official nava l record the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06804-06

    Original file (06804-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    06804-06 1 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnishedby the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 3 October 2006 with enclosure, a copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06276-06

    Original file (06276-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    06276-06 1 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08345-08

    Original file (08345-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04572-10

    Original file (04572-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2011. in this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion regarding the Cycle 2, 2006 PRT, and further observed that the earliest data currently appearing on PRIMS is for Cycle 1, 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10765-07

    Original file (10765-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10765-07 29 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07942-06

    Original file (07942-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,W.DEAN PFEIFFER Executive DirectorEnclosure5420 OPNAV Nl35 20 Nov 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04366-09

    Original file (04366-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 17 June 2009 with enclosure and the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 June 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00183-08

    Original file (00183-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Humphrey and Messrs. W. Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (3), Petitioner provided a confirmation of pregnancy dated 19 November 2007. f. In enclosure (4), OPNAV N135 again recommended denying Petitioner's request, as the pregnancy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02741-11

    Original file (02741-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ex Sheree of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06376-06

    Original file (06376-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished Consequently, when applying for a correction of anofficialnaval record, theburdenis ontheapplicant todemonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,Enclosure5420 OPNAV N135 3 Oct 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2)Subj: REQUEST FOR CO D RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OFRef: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1G(b) BCNR Case File 06376-061. Subject member petitioned...