Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06290-07
Original file (06290-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 SJN
 Docket No: 06290-07
19 May 2008







This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 1 March 2001 at age 18. You served without incident for over two years until 14 July 2003, when you received nonjudicial punishment for misbehavior of a sentinel or lookout. Based on the information currently contained in your record it appears an “early out” request was approved on 14 July 2003. On 15 September 2003, you were honorably released from active duty by reason of “reduction in force”. At that time you were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Additionally, it appears you were not recommended for retention.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your overall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated due to an “early out” request and is not recommended for retention. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


ROBERT D. Z SALMAN
Acting Executive Director


































2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07854-05

    Original file (07854-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 16 March 2000. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09877-07

    Original file (09877-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2008. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated due to an “early out” request and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02508-09

    Original file (02508-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2010. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated due to an “early out” request and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07250-07

    Original file (07250-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 April 2001, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. Regulations also direct assignment of an RE-4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11234-06

    Original file (11234-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 5 February 1982 for six years. However, the next two evaluations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08010-07

    Original file (08010-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nonetheless, on 16 May 2003, the discharge authority directed an honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07794-08

    Original file (07794-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 3 February 2003, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02646-07

    Original file (02646-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 July 1977 at age 18. At that time you were correctly assigned an RE-2...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00920-08

    Original file (00920-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06484-07

    Original file (06484-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your commanding officer recommended your request be approved, and on 2 August 2004 the discharge authority directed an honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a reduction in force. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...