Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07250-07
Original file (07250-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVYANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 SMW
 Docket No: 7250-07
10 April 2008







This is in reference to your application o f or correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board~ for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 April 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
On 25 April 2001, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. On 17 October 2002 and 6 May 2003, you were counseled regarding your failure to meet body composition and physical readiness test standards. On 15 June 2005, you received a performance evaluation in which you received a 2.0 rating in military bearing and character. The evaluation also indicated that you had significant problems and were not recommended for retention. On 14 October 2005, you received another performance evaluation in which you received a 2.0 rating in military bearing and character. The evaluation also stated that you had failed five physical fitness assessments during your enlistment. The evaluation indicated that you had significant problems and were not recommended for retention. Apparently you requested and were authorized an early release from your active duty contractual obligation to attend school. On 24 January 2006, you were honorably released from active duty to attend school and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.



Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are honorably released from active duty to attend school. Regulations also direct assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are not recommended for retention, fail to meet retention standards, or are serving in pay grade E—5 or above and have received a mark of 2.0 or below in any trait within a year prior to their expiration of active service. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05850-01

    Original file (05850-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A You were marked 3.0 ("meets The reporting senior noted The evaluation for the period ending 15 July 2000 showed you were now promotable and meeting standards in all categories. discharged from your second enlistment, you had not advanced Therefore, you met the criteria for reenlistment when For the first reenlistment, an However, at the time you were 2 Since you The Board found beyond E-3 and were not recommended for advancement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902001

    Original file (ND0902001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By unanimous vote, the awarded narrative reason for the discharge shall remain as issued.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04708-01

    Original file (04708-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 12 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. failure to pay a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01950-07

    Original file (01950-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 28 September 2001, you enlisted in the Navy at age 21. Given your three NJP’s, three PRT failures,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00303-02

    Original file (00303-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were 8 May 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 13-month period documenting three counselings and problems with your government credit card debt provided sufficient justify- cation for a non-recommendation for retention and assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06210-07

    Original file (06210-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03278-08

    Original file (03278-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2008. On 19 April 2007 you signed a performance evaluation in which you were not recommended for retention. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and is not recommended for retention.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06940-01

    Original file (06940-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found that the last performance evaluationdocumenting your FAP failures was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code without consideration of previous evaluations and concluded that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03909-02

    Original file (03909-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that your reenlistment code was assigned based on your performance during your last year on active duty, and that you were counseled concerning the fact that you were not eligible to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09632-02

    Original file (09632-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel o$ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Although the documents concerning your separation processing are not contained in your records, it is clear that you were processed for separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to your failure to disclose pre-service medical treatment and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...