Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02646-07
Original file (02646-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                  DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                  BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                  2 NAVY ANNEX
                  WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100




         TJR
Docket No: 2646-07
         3 June 2008





This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 11 July 1977 at age 18. You began a period of active duty and served without disciplinary infraction.

Subsequently, in March 1995, you were permitted to retire under an early retirement program. As a result, on 31 October 1995, after attaining sufficient service to comply with the early retirement program, specifically, 17 years, 11 months, and 19 days, you were honorably transferred to the fleet reserve. At that time you were correctly assigned an RE-2 reenlistment code.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service and your desire to change your assigned RE-2 reenlistment code so that you may enlist in the Army or Army Reserve. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code because of your nonrecomrnendatjon for reenlistment due to your retirement status. Further, the Board noted that in accordance with applicable directives you were ineligible for reenlistment as a result of your retirement status. Finally, an RE-2 reenlistment code is required when a Sailor is separated for this
reason and is not recommended or eligible for reenlistment. Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,




W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02489-08

    Original file (02489-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09464-07

    Original file (09464-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program of the Navy Reserve on 5 August 1994. Based on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11234-06

    Original file (11234-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 5 February 1982 for six years. However, the next two evaluations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06890-02

    Original file (06890-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The following day, your counsel responded that any Your counsel On 23 February 1998, the secretarial designee directed that your records be corrected to show that you were involuntarily discharged on 13 December 1995 by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08559-08

    Original file (08559-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval and health records, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. * After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09629-07

    Original file (09629-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. -In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02074-00

    Original file (02074-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    record (page 9) shows that for the period 11 March 1994 to 31 January 1995, you received an overall 3.6 performance evaluation. for the reenlistment of individuals who are discharged from the TDRL if they are otherwise qualified. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10335-09

    Original file (10335-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reenlistment code based on Accordingly, your application has been votes of the members of the panel will It is regretted that the circumstances favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9393 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR9393 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You did not respond in a timely manner and were honorably discharged from the TDRL program, and assigned an RE-3P (physical disability) reentry code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry code given the fact you were offered...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09584-05

    Original file (09584-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Docttmentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable ~tatutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Army on 23 July 1968 and served on active duty until you were honorably...