Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05625-07
Original file (05625-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                          DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                            BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                           2 NA VY ANNEX
         -                 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


BAN
 Docket No. 05625-07
16 June 2008


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo PERS-8l2 of 18 September 2007, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error o f injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, you application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of t he panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case a re such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure








DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
                                                      MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

                           1430
                                                                                           PERS-8l2
                                                                                          18 SEP 07
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

          Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF
En cl :    (1) BCNR File #05625—07
Ref: (a) BUPERSINST 1430.l6E
1. In reply to enclosure (1), the following comments and recommendations are submitted concerning case
2. A review of record indicates that he enlisted into the Full Time Support program on 15 September 2006. Per reference (a), due to having a break in active duty service over twenty-four hours, his actual date of rate would be the date of return on active duty and his time-in-rate (TIR) date would be established based of that date. This would result in his date or rate being 15 September 2006 and a TIR of 1 July 2006.
3.       Navy Reserve personnel who come on active duty in the same paygrade may use Drill Service is Paygrade (DSPG) to meet the time in rate requirements. DSPG is designed to allow PIR accrued while in the Navy Reserves to be credited to the member once on active duty. It is used for the singular purpose of TIR eligibility, and no final multiple points are credited. Using the guidance set forth in reference (a) we have determined that is eligible for six months creditable DSPG, and if otherwise eligible, would meet the TIR requirements to participate in the September 2008 (Cycle 200) Navy wide examination. Once meets the TIR requirement based on his active duty TIR date, DSPG will serve no purpose and need not be used.
3.       In view of the above information, it is our recommendation that this petition be denied. _ previous TIR has no effect on his current TIR due to his break in active duty service of over twenty—four hours.
4.       This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Point of Contact is PS1(SW) at Commercial 901—874—3196, DSN 882-3196, @navy.mil.
                 



By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01004-07

    Original file (01004-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1430 PERS-812 dtd 23 May 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04708-07

    Original file (04708-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 PERS812 of 27 July 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08107-07

    Original file (08107-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 PERS812 of 9 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03177-06

    Original file (03177-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 1430 Ser 48llE9/375, 13 June 2006 and 11 December 2006, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a), enclosure (1) is returned with the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00005-08

    Original file (00005-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    00005-08 24 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on March 24, 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08237-07

    Original file (08237-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 October 2007 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06730-06

    Original file (06730-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 PERS4812, 5 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04272-06

    Original file (04272-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chief Petty Officer XXXX was selected to Senior Chief Petty Officer with an effective date of 16 December 1998.b. BCNR ltr LCC:ddj Docket No: 9653-02 of 1 April 2003, directed Chief retroactive advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer be effective since there was no advisory indicating he was not in an eligible status to be advanced on that date. RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF HMCM Per reference (c), Chief XXXX new Time in Rate established his first eligibility for consideration to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01349-06

    Original file (01349-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NPC memorandum 1920, Ser 4834/031, 21 Jun 06 and NPC letter, 5420 POOJ6/1l3, 19 October 2006, a copy of each is attached. Members advanced under these procedures must be serving, in temporary officer status on the date enlisted advancement is effected.6. Accordingly,met both requirements in Aug 04, and his advancement to E—8 would have been effective 1 Jul 04.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11187-07

    Original file (11187-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    11187-07 24 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on March 24, 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...