DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 5454-07
6 November 2008
This is in reply to your letter of 7 October 2008 in which you
request, under the provisions of the Freedom of Information
Action and the Privacy Act copies of all of the documents
requested or considered by the Board in its review of your case.
You are specifically asking whether or not the Board obtained
investigations conducted by the Naval Criminal Investigative
Service, the Navy Inspector General, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation and documents that you allege are held by several
other commands and government agencies.
Please by advised that the only documentation considered or
obtained by the Board was your Application for Correction of
Military Records (DD Form 149) with its attachments, your
service record and a copy of your retirement point record which
was obtained from the Navy Personnel Command. At that time, the
Board was informed that you are receiving retired pay. A copy
of your retirement point record is enclosed.
As indicated in the Board's letter of 28 July 2008 there is
nothing in your service record regarding your allegations or
contentions. When your case was closed your service record was
returned to storage at the National Personal Record Center, St.
Louis, Missouri 63132. Once your record is returned to file,
you may obtain a copy by calling (314)592-1150, extension 4022.
The Board is not authorized to conduct investigations and the
burden of proof is on the applicant to show that an error or
injustice occurred. Further, the Board is only authorized to
correct individual service records of the Navy and Marine Corps.
A correction to other records of the Department of the Navy and
other government agencies is not authorized. A copy of the
Board's regulations is enclosed.
Therefore it appears that there is no further action that can be
taken by the Board at this time.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN P R
Executive tor
Enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04704-08
In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed, and your rebuttal thereto dated 29 July 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. As requested by the reference, we have audited your Career Retirement Credit Record (CRCR), enclosure (1), in order to establish your correct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08743-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter from the Navy Personnel Command, dated 24 May 2005, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04440-99
In your application you are requesting that you not be required to repay the cost of your education at the USNA. further administrative consideration of your case by submitting your resignation, and you admitted guilt in your resignation letter. There is no evidence in the record, and you have However, you precluded any It is Concerning the decision to waive recoupment of educational costs for Mr. 0 in 1996 despite his use of LSD, the Board determined that this waiver action resulted from...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00137 1
REQUESTING COPIES OF MILITARY RECORDS Pricr to applying for discharge review, potential applicants or their designated representatives may obtain copies of their military personnel records by submitting a Standard Form (SF) 180, Request Pertaining to Military Records, to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), 9700 Page Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63132-5200. This letter serves as notice that I am initiating an action against you which could result in your involuntary separation from the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07210-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, initially considered and denied your application on 22 July 2008. After the statements had been gathered an informal disciplinary review board consisting of senior noncommissioned officers examined the statements and conducted individual interviews of the seven Sailors who had accused you of sexual misconduct. Your commanding officer also testified before the ADB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02595-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. 1034 you may request the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) consider an application for correction of your military records. 3 a 1 September 1999. timely review of this case is requested.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004093
The applicant requests that her discharge from the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and her records corrected to show she transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant provides orders, dated 22 July 1998, assigning her to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement); discharge orders, dated 21 October 1999; and her notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (her 20-year letter). If a Soldier does not earn the required 50 retirement points during a retirement year and the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04417-00
On 6 February 1971 you reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for six years. your years of qualifying service for reserve retirement. IN REPLY REFER TO 1821 MMSR-5 '14 Nov 96 Dear concerning record to the United that although 11 months are (IRR) United States Code, sections 12731 and 12732, require 365/366 day period in which a member earns a This is in response to your letter of 27 August 1996, your eligibility for Reserve Retired Pay.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000183
He does not understand how the Board could come to the conclusion that it did given all of the investigative evidence that the applicant had provided. He states, in part, that he “cannot fathom why you [the Board] came to the conclusions and decisions you did and granted no relief at all It is my opinion that even though the Department of the Army (DA) has found Blanchfield Army Community Hospital (BACH) guilty of not following DOD and Army regulations in the processing of my case the ABCMR...
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01145
Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Police record check letter Mental Health evaluation letter Training Documents (58pgs) Reference letters (2) Letter for recommendation Copies of DD Form 214 (2) Letter from Commanding Officer (2pgs) Medical consultation letter Letter of Deficiency (3pgs) Service related documents (106pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service,...