Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04543-07
Original file (04543-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE |
Docket No. 04543-07
5 May 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

 
 

Subj: FORMER en
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected to show that he received a more favorable

reentry code that RE-4.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. —9gMMeand Messrs. (i> and

hh. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
‘ on 1 May 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that

the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,

finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner served on active duty in the Navy form 22
February to 11 April 2001, when he was discharged by reason of
erroneous entry due to residuals of a pre-service arm injury
which limited his ability to participate in recruit training. He

was assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner failed to demonstrate that he
was discharged in error, and improperly assigned a reentry code
of RE-4; however, it believes that it would be in the interest
of justice to remove the stigma of the RE-4 from his naval
records. Accordingly, the Board finds the existence of an
injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that

on 11 April 2001, he was assigned a reentry code of RE-3E in
place of the RE-4 he was actually assigned on that date.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings made a part of
Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN AMES . E CIOS
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

TR BP, Awl a

Fou W. DEAN FEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01026-07

    Original file (01026-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received a reentry code more favorable than RE-4. The Board, consisting of Ms. QM and Messrs. (RRs and ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 January 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11076-08

    Original file (11076-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 11076-08 21 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy ae ted Sub}: FORMER in REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner requests further consideration of his request for correction of his record to show that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10966-07

    Original file (10966-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. "\ijiililimg, and Messrs. WNR@lie and a: reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2008 and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show, as an exception to policy, that he was assigned an reentry code of RE- 3E on 16 December 2005. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00813-07

    Original file (00813-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was assigned a reentry code of RE-4 because his commanding officer had withdrawn the recommendation for his advancement and retention on 20 July 2006. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show, as an exception to policy, that he was assigned a reentry code of RE-6 on 20 July 2006, vice the code of RE-~4 he actually received on that date. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04460-09

    Original file (04460-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 26 February 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice or September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 26 February 2008, Petitioner was assigned an RE-3E reentry code instead of the RE-4 reentry code actually...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR220 14

    Original file (NR220 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received a reentry code of “RE-3R” (not meeting the professional growth criteria)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08238-09

    Original file (08238-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by _Cchanging the reentry code he was assigned on 30 July 2008. c. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of reentry codes of RE-3G or RE-4 to individuals discharged by reason of a condition not a disability. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 30 July 2008, he was assigned a reentry code of RE-3G.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04866-09

    Original file (04866-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 13 dune 2008. He was assigned a reentry code of RE-3R. Although he was not qualified for service as an aircrewman, it appears that he was physically qualified for general service and that it would be appropriate and just to change his reentry code to RE-1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04872-08

    Original file (04872-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 11 March 2008. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 20 February 2008. The Board concludes that the reentry code of RE-3E should be assigned since there is no evidence that Petitioner had any disciplinary infractions during her brief period of service and her record does not otherwise support the more stigmatizing code of RE-4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02234-09

    Original file (02234-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 24 November 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. SQR0IIweeeSMMM....an¢ ,reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on...