DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL- RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 4866-09
27 July 2009
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: : EVIEW OF
NAVAL RECORD ™
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
(2) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by
changing the reentry code he was assigned on 13 dune 2008.
Mr ae and Mr.
oe i calli eviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 8 July 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, reguiations and policies.
2. The Board, consisting of vs
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
Lollows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 5 February 2008. On
5 June 2008 his commanding officer directed separation based on
his being diagnosed with a heart murmur. on 15 June 2008 he
received an entry level separation by reason of a defective
enlistment agreement because he did not qualify for service as an
aircrewman due to the heart murmur. He was assigned a reentry
code of RE-3R.
c. An RE-3R reentry code is assigned to individuals when
discharged for a defective enlistment agreement. An RE-1 reentry
code means that the individual is fully qualified for
reenlistment.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board conciudes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. In this regard, the Board notes that Petitioner's record
was free of any disciplinary action during his period of service.
In addition, the Board concludes that the RE-3R reentry is
inappropriate given the circumstances of Petitioner's case.
Although he was not qualified for service as an aircrewman, it
appears that he was physically qualified for general service and
that it would be appropriate and just to change his reentry code
to RE-1.
_ RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on
13 June 2008, he was assigned an RE-1 reentry code instead of the
RE-3R reentry code actually assigned on that date.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Je bes |
A
Recorder cting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04150-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 6 June 2006. On 6 June 2006 he received an entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment agreement and was assigned a reentry code of RE-4. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 6 June 2006, Petitioner was assigned an RE-1 reentry code instead of the RE-4 reentry code actually assigned on that date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR220 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The Board, consisting of Mr. 4salman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received a reentry code of “RE-3R” (not meeting the professional growth criteria)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4679 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code, which was issued on 13 April 2013. At that time he was recommended for promotion and continued service in the Navy Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reentry code. Such a code may also be assigned if the commanding officer does not recommend the individual for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 08708-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable reenlistment code.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on4 Augustl 2004, and, pursuant to its regulations determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Reference (b) authorizes the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00348-02
Regulations RE-3R, RE-4, and RE- g- Petitioner states that he tried to get his reenlistment He provides a copy of an e-mail from the executive who states that the personnel support detachment (PSD) An e-mail on 5 October 2001, code corrected by the separation activity subsequent to his discharge. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show he was discharged with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment with an RE-1 reenlistment code, vice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08462-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 26 November 1993. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 22 November 1989. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 26 November 1993, he was assigned a reentry code of RE-1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11022-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 11022-10 28 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Tor Secretary of the Navy subs REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1¢0 (9 Ref: (a) 10 U.8.€. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. ae......
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00573-08
The Board, consisting of Messrs. ih, ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE~4 reenlistment code, assigned on 2 June 1989, to RE-3R. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 08198-04
The Board, consisting of Mr. Leeman, Mr. Pfeiffer and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Petitioner subsequently enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve, On 14 September 2001 he reported for active duty and served for one year. Therefore, Petitioner’s record should be corrected to show that on 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09855-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 8955-10 27 October 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Lo; Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER GS NAVAL RECORD REVIEW OF —— Seen Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code he was assigned on 18...