Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01091-07
Original file (01091-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG

Docket No: 1091-07
27 June 2008

 

 

 
 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United

States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 June 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations

and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

The record shows that on 8 June 1984 you were issued a
Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60. On 16
January 1989, you reported for a period of extended active duty.
Subsequently, you developed physical problems, and were processed
through the physical disability system. After review, the
Physical Evaluation Board found that you had a disability rated
at 10%. You were given the options of either accepting discharge

 

 

Reserve with eligibility for retired pay on 1 November 1996, your
60th birthday. You elected discharge and were honorably
discharged on 31 January 1990 with disability severance pay in
the amount of $98,942.40. When you accepted disability severance
pay, your eligibility for reserve retired pay was ended.

The record shows that in 1991, the Board denied your request for
an increase in your disability rating to 30% anda disability
retirement. You are now requesting that your record be corrected
to show that you were not discharged on 31 January 1990 with
disability severance pay but transferred to the Retired Reserve

with eligibility for retired pay at age 60. You also point out
that since you are not retired, you are not eligible for the
recently enacted Combat Related Special Compensation or
Concurrent Receipt of Military Retired Pay and Department of
Veterans Affairs compensation. You believe that this lack of

eligibility compounds the injustice that has been inflicted in
your case.

The Board believed that you made an informed and well considered
decision when you elected disability severance pay in 1990, given
the amount of the payment and the fact that you would not have
been eligible for reserve retired pay for over seven years which
certainly provided a reasonable basis for acceptance of
disability severance pay. The fact that the law has since
changed to allow further benefits for retired servicemembers does
not establish a basis for a correction to your record. The Board
concluded that you were properly discharged on 31 January 1990
anda correction to your record is not warranted.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Bens

W. DEAN PF
Executive or

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009696

    Original file (20080009696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a supplemental letter, dated 12 May 2008; a letter from the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, dated 20 February 2008; a memorandum, Subject: Transfer to an Inactive Status or Discharge with Severance Pay, dated 14 January 1988; a memorandum, Subject: Review of Proceedings of Physical Evaluation Board, dated 11 August 1987; an extract from Army Regulation 635-40, dated 13 December 1985; his Notification of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009294

    Original file (20090009294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document also shows the applicant was advised to "explain that you were not properly briefed concerning the ramifications of accepting severance pay (loss of all benefits from the Armed Forces)" and "that you believed that when [the] VA withheld your VA disability payments until they equaled the amount of money you received in Army severance pay, you were paying back to the Army the severance pay." The Department of Defense (DoD) Finance Management Regulation (FMR), Volume 7A (Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012639

    Original file (20080012639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the State of North Carolina published orders on 2 January 1996 which indicate the applicant was being processed for separation and that he was authorized disability severance pay. Since it appears the applicant was not properly informed that if he accepted severance pay then he would not be eligible for retired pay, and since he understands that granting his request would require him to pay back his severance pay, it would be equitable to restore the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013769

    Original file (20100013769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Immediately following his Army discharge, he applied to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for disability compensation and he was granted a 70 percent (%) disability rating in 1990 and 100% in 1993; c. The VA began deducting money from his VA disability compensation in various amounts starting 1 September 1990 to reimburse the Army the severance pay he received; d. In April 2007, he completed an application for retirement and returned it to the Retirement Personnel Office, Frankfort,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015500

    Original file (20110015500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) stated, “As a Soldier with a rating of less than 30% who may have at least 20 qualifying years for Reserve retirement UP Chapter 67, Title 10, USC, you may have the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting your Reserve retirement pay, or you may request transfer to inactive Reserve status and receive Reserve retired pay at age 60” (22 January 2007). These statements were interpreted to mean he was requesting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019406

    Original file (20100019406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his records be corrected so that he may receive retired pay at age 60. Since he was originally eligible for retired pay at age 60, has repaid his severance pay, and his orders and NGB Form 22 assigned him to the Retired Reserve, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct his record by voiding his 30 September 1991 disability discharge with severance pay and to show he was transferred to Retired Reserve on that same date. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018288C070206

    Original file (20050018288C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 November 2004 with a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) dated 8 July 2005; results of a lumbar spine examination dated 9 February 2000; a 13 May 2005 letter from Alliance Primary Care; a Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) dated 9 January 2000; an SF 93 (Report of Medical History) dated 9 January 2000; dental records; 7 pages of laboratory results dated 9 January 2000; a health risk appraisal profile;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000043C070205

    Original file (20060000043C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states the civilian handling his case recommended he not take the 10 percent severance pay because he would have to pay it back when he started to receive his retired pay. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 21 August 2005 and his DA Form 199 (Physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014019

    Original file (20060014019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received severance pay in 1990 and he was retired by reason of physical disability on 26 January 2006. While the Board understands the applicant’s concerns, recoupment of separation/severance pay when an individual later qualifies for retired pay or disability compensation is a requirement of law. DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION (DENY) REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1.128.0800 291/SEV PAY 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021668

    Original file (20110021668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she was transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 instead of discharged due to disability with severance pay. In view of the foregoing, the applicant's record should be corrected to show she elected Reserve Retirement in lieu of severance pay as follows: a. correcting her DD Form 214 and/or any related documents to show she was separated due to physical disability - other with an SPD...