Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000043C070205
Original file (20060000043C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        27 July 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20060000043


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann            |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Edward E. Montgomery          |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his disability severance pay be reinstated.

2.  The applicant states the civilian handling his case recommended he not
take the 10 percent severance pay because he would have to pay it back when
he started to receive his retired pay.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 21 August 2005 and his DA
Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings).

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

Counsel makes no additional statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 24 October 1954.  After having had prior
service  in the Regular Army and the Army National Guard, he transferred to
the U. S. Army Reserve in 1987.  His notification of eligibility for
retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) was issued on 1 September 2004.

2.  On 27 January 2003, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support
of Operation Enduring Freedom.  He was promoted to Sergeant First Class, E-
7  effective 1 November 2003.

3.  The applicant’s Medical Evaluation Board proceedings are not available.
 On 11 February 2005, an informal PEB found him to be physically unfit due
to partial complex seizure disorder (10 percent); chronic low back pain
secondary to multilevel degenerative disc disease without tenderness on
examination, radiculopathy, or muscle spasm (zero percent); and chronic
neck pain due to multilevel degenerative disc disease, without tenderness
on examination, radiculopathy or muscle spasm and with no significant loss
of range of motion (zero percent).  The informal PEB recommend he be
separated with severance pay.

4.  The DA Form 199 noted the applicant had at least 20 qualifying years
for a Reserve retirement.  He had the option of accepting disability
severance pay and forfeiting his Reserve retirement or he could choose to
be placed in an inactive
Reserve status and receive Reserve retired pay at the age of 60.  If he
elected transfer to the inactive Reserve for the purpose of receiving
Reserve retired pay at age 60, no disability compensation would be
computed.  He was advised to contact a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
counselor to learn about available benefits to include disability
compensation.

5.  The DA Form 199 indicates the applicant did not concur and demanded a
formal hearing, although he did not sign the DA Form 199.  No other PEB
paperwork is available.

6.  On 21 August 2005, the applicant was released from active duty after
completing a total of 6 years, 6 months, and 18 days of creditable active
service.

7.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1209 states any member of the armed
forces who has at least 20 years of service [for a reserve retirement] and
who would be qualified for disability retirement but for the fact that his
disability is less than
30 percent may elect, instead of being separated, to be transferred to the
inactive status list under section 12735 of this title and, if otherwise
eligible, to receive [reserve] retired pay upon becoming 60 years of age.

8.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1212(c) states the amount of disability
severance pay received shall be deducted from any compensation for the same
disability to which the former member becomes entitled under any law
administered by the VA.  Thus, VA compensation may be withheld as an offset
on a monthly basis until the total amount of military severance pay has
been recovered.

9.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1213 states that, unless a person who has
received disability severance pay again becomes a member of an armed force
he is not entitled to any payment from the armed force from which he was
separated for, or arising out of, his service before separation, under any
law administered by one of those services or for it by another of those
services.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant was properly informed of the consequences of accepting
severance pay instead of retired pay at age 60.  By law, had he elected to
receive severance pay, he would not be entitled to receive retired pay at
age 60. The applicant fails to provide evidence of error or injustice in
this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jtm___  __jcr___  __eem___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  __John T. Meixell_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20060000043                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |20060727                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |                                        |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |108.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011591

    Original file (20090011591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical condition was rated at 20 percent disabling. Army Regulation 635-40, appendix B, Army Application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, paragraph B-3f, provides that conditions which do not render a Soldier unfit for military service will not be considered in determining the compensable disability rating unless the conditions contribute to the finding of unfitness. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010575C070205

    Original file (20060010575C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Court found that the ABCMR never considered the applicant’s objections to the Army’s use of the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code “5293 (intervertebral disc syndrome) even though the VA used VASRD 5295 (lumbosacral strain).” (The Court reversed the codes – the Army used VASRD 5295 and the DVA used VASRD 5293.) On 26 August 1999, an informal PEB found the applicant to be unfit, under VASRD codes 5299 and 5295, due to a diagnosis of chronic low...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005245C070208

    Original file (20040005245C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that evidence was not available at the time of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) so he was not correctly evaluated. The applicant provides his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings); an Operation Report dictated 29 May 2003; three radiologic examination reports (two 1-page reports and one 2-page report) dated 6 July 2004; two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports printed 25 June 2004; a 2-page Statement of Attending Physician dated 22 June 2004;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000108C070206

    Original file (20050000108C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The formal PEB rated this condition as 10 percent disabling. Even if the applicant’s urinary incontinence did fail medical retention standards, without evidence that he could not perform his duties due to that condition it would not be considered physically unfitting. In addition, the applicant has not submitted any evidence or argument which would lead the Board to believe that a reconvened formal PEB would have determined that the applicant was physically unfit due to urinary incontinence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012513

    Original file (20070012513.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The WAARNG either mistakenly processed the applicant through this channel, not connecting the fact that his neck condition might have been related to the June 1998 and March 2000 injuries, or deliberately processed him through this channel because there was no line of duty determination on his June 1998 and March 2000 injuries. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00778

    Original file (PD2011-00778.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Compression fractures (15% of L1 vertebral body compressed), anterior corner fracture of L4, compression deformities of T9-T11 and L1), degenerative changes of LS spine, straightened lordosis, and scoliosis documented on x-ray 20030227.§4.71a Rating2002 VASRD 529320% for moderate, recurring attacks (PEB)20% for moderate, recurring attacks2002 VASRD 529210% for slight10% for slight (VA assigned 40% for severe)2002 VASRD 8520Not applicable with 5293; 10% with 52922002 VASRD 528510% additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004264

    Original file (20070004264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 June 2006, the applicant concurred with the medical board findings and his case was referred to the PEB for further medical review. The applicant's record shows that he did not concur with the PEB’s findings. On 19 January 2007, the PEB rated the applicant with a 10 percent disability rating for his back pain, zero percent rating for his knees, and zero percent rating for his shoulder impingement syndrome and recommended his separation with severance pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023167

    Original file (20110023167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The results of the applicant's MDRB, dated 15 April 2002, shows he: * was diagnosed with HNP radiculopathy L4, spinal stenosis * was not able to comply with all of his MOS duties * had 20 years of service * qualified to retire under medical conditions * was receiving VA compensation with a combined rating of 60 percent * was given a permanent profile under L4 with the assignment limitations of unfit for service * was unfit for retention in the PRARNG, in accordance with Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018288C070206

    Original file (20050018288C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 November 2004 with a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) dated 8 July 2005; results of a lumbar spine examination dated 9 February 2000; a 13 May 2005 letter from Alliance Primary Care; a Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) dated 9 January 2000; an SF 93 (Report of Medical History) dated 9 January 2000; dental records; 7 pages of laboratory results dated 9 January 2000; a health risk appraisal profile;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008426

    Original file (20130008426.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests correction of the applicant's records to show: * he was medically retired and placed on the Retired List at the rate of 50 percent (50%) effective 12 February 2007 * entitlement to back retired pay from the date of his transfer to the Retired Reserve to the present 2. The applicant should be retired. Counsel provides: * DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) * Request for Transfer to the Retired Reserve in lieu of Disability Processing * Transfer to an Inactive Status Discharge...