Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013769
Original file (20100013769.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 
		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  01 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013769 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reinstatement of his retired pay.

2.  The applicant states the following:

	a.  Injuries he sustained while driving a military vehicle in March 1998 resulted in his involuntary discharge from the Army with severance pay totaling $57,353.60 on 28 August 1990;

	b.  Immediately following his Army discharge, he applied to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for disability compensation and he was granted a 70 percent (%) disability rating in 1990 and 100% in 1993;

	c.  The VA began deducting money from his VA disability compensation in various amounts starting 1 September 1990 to reimburse the Army the severance pay he received;

	d.  In April 2007, he completed an application for retirement and returned it to the Retirement Personnel Office, Frankfort, KY;

	e.  In September 2008, he received retirement orders confirming his placement on the Retired List on 4 March 2007, and he was issued his first retired pay installment on 2 February 2009;


	f.  In February 2009, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (HRC-STL) informed him his retirement orders were revoked because he received severance pay and once paid back in full, he could receive retired pay;

	g.  Upon verifying the amount of severance pay still owed with the VA, he remitted a cashier’s check in the amount of $15,649.60 to the VA and faxed a copy of the receipt to HRC-STL on 11 March 2009;

	h.  On 24 July 2009, HRC-STL reissued retirement orders;

	i.  On 11 August 2009, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) issued him a letter confirming his debt was cancelled; and 

	j.  He has completed all actions required of him in order to receive retired pay and although he was previously told he would not have to submit an application to this Board, he now seeks reinstatement of his retired pay.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents:

* Self-authored statements, dated 11 March, 5 August, and 10 September 2009
* Retirement orders, dated 9 September 2008 and 24 July 2009
* HRC-STL letter
* VA letters, dated 2 and 11 March, 5 June, and 25 August 2009
* Xeroxed copy of a cashiers/certified check with client’s copy
* VA Form 5602 (Receipt for Returned Treasury Check)
* DFAS letters, dated 6 July and 8 August 2009 with attachments
* Express Mail mailing label
* U.S. Postal Service mailing label

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's record show he initially enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and he served in that capacity in an active status and/or on active duty from 29 April 1965 to 26 July 1982, at which time he was honorably discharged from the Kentucky ARNG (KYARNG).  The National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (NGB Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he completed
17 years, 2 months, and 28 days of creditable active service.

3.  On 27 July 1982, the applicant was appointed a Reserve warrant officer of the Army in the rank of chief warrant officer two (CW2), accepted appointment in the ARNG, and he was granted Federal recognition in the KYARNG.

4.  The applicant was ordered to full time active duty in the KYARNG and he entered active duty on 7 May 1984.  He was awarded and served in area of concentration (AOC) 920A (Property Accounting Technician).

5.  On 28 August 1990, the applicant was processed through the Army’s Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and he was honorably discharged from active duty by reason of “physical disability - severance pay” totaling $57,393.60. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to him at that time shows he completed a total of 11 years, 5 months, and
12 days of active duty service and 13 years, 10 months, and 18 days of total prior inactive service.

6.  On 9 September 2008, HRC-STL issued Orders P07-813861 directing the applicant's placement on the Army of the United States (AUS) Retired List on
4 March 2007, his 60th birthday.

7.  The Chief, Transition and Separations, HRC-STL, informed the applicant that his retirement orders were revoked based on his having received severance pay from the Army.  He was further reminded that if he chose to elect to receive severance pay, he severed all ties between the Army and himself.

8.  On 6 July 2009, DFAS issued the applicant a letter and an Account Statement informing him he incurred a Retired pay debt due to his receipt of severance pay through 28 February 2009.  He was also informed that had been overpaid in the amount of $35,387.98.

9.  On 11 August 2009, DFAS notified the applicant his debt of $35,387.98 was cancelled.

10.  On 24 July 2009, the Chief, The Adjutant General (TAG) Directorate, West, HRC-STL issued Orders Number P07-908490, again directing the applicant’s placement on the AUS Retired List on 4 March 2007.
11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12731 provides the legal authority and age and service requirements to receive non-regular retired pay at age 60.  It states, in pertinent part, that members of the Reserve Components who complete at least 20 years of qualifying service are eligible to receive retired pay upon application at age 60.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should be authorized retired pay based on his completion of over more than 20 years of qualifying service and repayment of his disability severance pay has been carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  By law, members of the Reserve Components who complete at least 20 years of qualifying service are eligible to receive retired pay upon application at age 60.

3.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s processing through the Army’s PDES ultimately led to his discharge from active duty by reason of physical disability with severance pay on 28 August 1990, as evidenced by his DD Form 214 on file.  In 2008, 18 years after this action, HRC-STL published orders authorizing the applicant's placement on the Retired List, effective
4 March 2007, his 60th birthday.  The orders were later properly revoked because the applicant had received disability severance pay.

4.  During this process, the applicant was informed by officials at HRC-STL that he could in fact qualify for retired pay if he repaid his severance pay and all debts to the government.  The applicant followed these instructions and paid the debt in full, as confirmed by the DFAS action cancelling the debt.  Subsequently,
HRC-STL again authorized the applicant's placement on the Retired List, effective 4 March 2007.  However, it appears DFAS has refused to honor this action, without action by this Board, because his discharge orders have never been revoked.

5.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was originally eligible to elect non-regular retirement instead of separation with severance pay at the time of his disability separation in 1990.  It appears the applicant may not have been given the opportunity to elect receipt of retired pay in lieu of disability severance pay.  It further shows the applicant was informed by officials at HRC-STL that repayment of his severance pay would qualify him for non-regular retirement pay at age 60.

6.  Further, the record confirms HRC-STL retirement officials twice published orders authorizing the applicant's placement on the Retired List, effective
4 March 2007, his 60th birthday.  As a result, given the applicant was originally eligible and because his placement on the Retired List was authorized by the responsible Army agency, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct his record by voiding his 28 August 1990 disability discharge with severance pay, and to show he was instead transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date.

7.  Further, the applicant should be provided all back retired pay due from 
4 March 2007, minus any severance pay or retired pay that may not have been previously collected.

BOARD VOTE:

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by voiding his 28 August 1990 disability discharge and to show he was instead transferred to the Retired Reserve on that same date; and by providing him all back retired pay due from 4 March 2007, minus any severance pay or retired pay that may not have been already collected.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013769



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013769



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026196

    Original file (20100026196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant elected not to concur with the PEB's findings and recommendations and requested a formal hearing. b. the PEB also noted the applicant had a rating of less than 30% and at least 20 qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement under the provisions of chapter 67 of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC); therefore, he had the option of accepting disability severance pay and forfeiting his Reserve retirement pay, or he had the option of requesting a transfer to inactive Reserve status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004700

    Original file (20090004700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to rectify the multiple errors, it is appropriate to correct the record to show that the applicant had 20 qualifying years of service as of 25 May 1992, that he was issued a proper 20-year letter, that he elected to receive non-regular retirement in lieu of disability severance pay, that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve 26 May 1992 with entitlement to retired pay upon attaining age 60, and that he was placed on the Retired List effective 26 June 2008 with entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008749

    Original file (20100008749.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 October 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100008749 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The available evidence shows the applicant submitted his marriage license and DD Form 2656-6 to the Retirement Branch, HRC-STL, on 25 March 2009 requesting reduced spouse SBP coverage. Therefore, it would be equitable to correct his DD Form 2656-6 to show he completed the form and elected to participate in the SBP on 24 March 2009 and to correct his applicable records to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012639

    Original file (20080012639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the State of North Carolina published orders on 2 January 1996 which indicate the applicant was being processed for separation and that he was authorized disability severance pay. Since it appears the applicant was not properly informed that if he accepted severance pay then he would not be eligible for retired pay, and since he understands that granting his request would require him to pay back his severance pay, it would be equitable to restore the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009918

    Original file (20100009918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she elected not to participate in the SBP; however, SBP premium payments were withdrawn from her first retirement pay statement. She states when she initially completed the form electing to decline SBP coverage, there were no instructions stating that signatures on the form must be notarized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009453

    Original file (20100009453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    h. On 7 January 2008, the applicant was advised by the 9th MSC to submit a request for extension on active duty in order to complete her medical treatment. s. The applicant has always considered herself to be on active duty and has never schemed to remain on active duty any longer than necessary to complete her required medical treatment and to be properly out-processed. The applicant provides the following enclosures: * Orders P-04-79005A01, dated 24 May 2007 * Orders C-04-710733A01,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015402

    Original file (20080015402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition may not be considered to be a physical disability by the Army and yet be rated by the DVA as a disability. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014517

    Original file (20090014517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s unit commander prepared a Memorandum for Record, dated 5 August 2009, confirming the following: a. e. HRC-St. Louis should submit pay documents for the applicant and publish a discharge order effective after the date of her last drill. As a result, the Board recommends that DFAS waive the debt incurred by the applicant based on the erroneous payment of allowances for Reserve drills performed between 7 August and 5 November 2007 in the interest of equity.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014575

    Original file (20110014575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110014575 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * The FSM's U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Notification of Eligibility for Retirement Pay at Age 60 (20-year Letter) * Orders * DFAS printout titled Summary of Retired Pay Account * A certificate of death * A letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Fort Knox, KY * A letter from the National Personnel Records Center CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012219

    Original file (20090012219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official stated that, due to the applicant having been transferred to the inactive list on 19 June 2007 and subsequently transferred back to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 15 August 2007, he was not on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) for one continuous year prior to the convening date of the 2007 DA Reserve Components Colonel AMEDD Selection Board. If selected for promotion, his orders to the Retired Reserve should be voided, his promotion effective date and...