Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09618-06
Original file (09618-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



DJC
Docket No. 9618-06
28 February 2007










This is in reference to your application for correction of your husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 2 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,





Enclosure






2 Feb 07


MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C)

Subj:    COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION ICO ~

Ref:     (a)      BCNR Pay memo of 14 Nov 06
         (b)      DoD Financial Management Regulation
(Vol 7B)

End:     (1)      CO 1 NRPC ltr 1820 N2/RS dtd 4 Jun 98
         (2)      CO, NRPC ltr 1772 N2222/LA/rsb
                  17 Jun 98

1.       In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his spouse in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

2.       The recommendation is based on the following:

a. XXX transferred to the Retired List (without pay) on 1 June 1998. He died on 1~1 August 2004.

b. XXXX and were married on 7 November 1970.

c. XXXX received his Notice of Eligibility (NOE), enclosure (1), from the Naval Reserve Personnel Center (NRPC) on 27 June 1998 informing him that he had completed over 20 years of creditable military service. Additionally, enclosure (2) was provided to inform his spouse of the protections offered under the RCSBP. The information provided explained the options available under the RCSBP.

3.       did not elect to participate the required timeframe after received therefore not eligible f or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08663-07

    Original file (08663-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    08663-07 22 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 19, 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10316-06

    Original file (10316-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. When received his NOE he was unmarried and had no eligible beneficiary for participation in the RCSBP andremarried on 15 October 2005.c. As previously stated, was unmarried when he received his NOE and is divorce decree contained no provision requiring him to provide former spouse RCSBP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5444 14

    Original file (NR5444 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter 'referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from child only to- spouse and child coverage. k. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request has no merit and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09531-06

    Original file (09531-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9531-06 14 February 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4533 14

    Original file (NR4533 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, as of 3 January 2005, you have been enrolled in an immediate RC-SBP annuity for your spouse and child{ren).” See ‘enclosure (7). They notified Petitioner that as of 3 January 2005, he had been enrolled in the RCSBP under the spouse and child category with immediate (Option C) coverage. b. Petitioner is responsible for future unpaid RCSBP costs (Petitioner will be eligible for retire pay on or about 20 April 2021) that would have been deducted if he enrolled at the time of his Marriage.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03267-06

    Original file (03267-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted that, although he was eligible, your deceased husband had never enrolled in the Reserve component Survivor Benefit Plan after becoming eligible for retirement (without pay). They found that he had received ample opportunity to request retired pay and enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan during the almost 14 years between 8 April 1991 to 18 January 2005. was eligible for retired pay on 8 April 1991.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09737-06

    Original file (09737-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9737-06 14 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. In response to reference...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06521-02

    Original file (06521-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application; together with all material submitted in record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02558-06

    Original file (02558-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2558-06 9 May 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802009

    Original file (9802009.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and AFI 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: itary records of the Department of the Air Force relating t e corrected to show that on 25 May 1998, he elected spo coverage, under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan, based on full...