NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5444 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter 'referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from child only to- spouse and child coverage. k. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request has no merit and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4533 14
Therefore, as of 3 January 2005, you have been enrolled in an immediate RC-SBP annuity for your spouse and child{ren).” See ‘enclosure (7). They notified Petitioner that as of 3 January 2005, he had been enrolled in the RCSBP under the spouse and child category with immediate (Option C) coverage. b. Petitioner is responsible for future unpaid RCSBP costs (Petitioner will be eligible for retire pay on or about 20 April 2021) that would have been deducted if he enrolled at the time of his Marriage.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09618-06
9618-06 28 February 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11104-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00035 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 June 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s marital status be changed from “single” to “married” in the year 2001, and that his records be changed to show he elected to participate in the...
If neither the member nor the former spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Eligibility and premiums are reinstated effective the first day of the month after the date the former spouse's remarriage terminates. Discussion: Although the member made no election change during the required one- year time limit following divorce, there is no evidence that he requested DFAS terminate his former...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008545
BOARD DATE: 13 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120008545 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides an 18 October 1989 court document showing separation from Pamela, a 14 August 2003 court document showing an uncontested termination of marriage from Susan, a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter), a 13 November 2002 RCSBP election form, a 29 February 2004 marriage certificate to Anna, and a 12 April 2012 RCSBP election form. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028817
The form shows he elected spouse and children RCSBP coverage based on the full amount of retired pay and Option C (Immediate Coverage). The DD Form 2656-6 he submitted includes the following note below item 8: If either "Divorce" or "Death of Spouse" is selected, and the member has previously elected spouse and child coverage, the coverage would convert to "Child Only" coverage if the member has an eligible child. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request to void his...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-186
Although CWO4 T did not elect the applicant as a former spouse beneficiary after their divorce, the applicant claims that she is entitled to RCSBP payments under CWO4 T’s 1992 original election certificate for spousal coverage because the guidance provided to CWO4 T and her at the time of his election did not require him to take any further action to keep her as his beneficiary if they divorced. Nor is the applicant a former spouse beneficiary under CWO4 T’s RCSBP. Nor is she a former...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09737-06
9737-06 14 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. In response to reference...