Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08517-06
Original file (08517-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVYANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 DJC
 Docket No. 8517-06
24 January 2007
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/714 dtd 17 Jan 07
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
2. The Board, consisting of Washington, Chapman, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.










Docket No. 8517-06
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a.       The 13 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 11 September 2006, is null and void.
b.       The petitioner executed a 1 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 11 September 2006.
c.       The petitioner was discharged 30 September 2006 and reenlisted on 1 October 2006. The term is 6 years.
d.       This change will entitle the member to a zone “C” SRB with an award level of 3.5 for the IT (2781) rate/NEC. Remaining obligated service to 10 October 2006 will be deducted from SRB computation. Remaining obligated service beyond the 16 year active date will not be included in the SRB calculation.
e.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder         Acting Recorder

 5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



 24 January 2007
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
 Executive Director





2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05654-06

    Original file (05654-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5654-0631January2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. 5654-06RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06247-06

    Original file (06247-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leernan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10535-06

    Original file (10535-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Leeman, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on •24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10177-06

    Original file (10177-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09406-06

    Original file (09406-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Washington, Chapman, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06544-06

    Original file (06544-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Washington, Chapman, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05751-06

    Original file (05751-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Washington, Chapman, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09843-06

    Original file (09843-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    9843-06 31 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06243-06

    Original file (06243-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03464-06

    Original file (03464-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The 20 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 14 June 2006, is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...