Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03464-06
Original file (03464-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

DJC
Docket No. 3464-06
24 October 2006


From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO


Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2)      NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/ 475 of 4 Aug 06
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB).

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Haney, Mr Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.








Docket No. 3464-06




RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       The 20 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 14 June 2006, is null and void. This will establish an EAOS of 13 June 2006.

b.       The 1 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 14 May 2006, is null and void. This will establish an EAOS of 13 May 2006.

c.       The petitioner executed a 2 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 14 May 2006, via the OBLISERVE to Train (OTT) option.

d.       The petitioner was discharged on 22 June 2006 and reenlisted on 23 June 2006. The term is 3 years.

e.       The Branch/Class(BR/CL) on the reenlistment executed on or about 23 June 2006 is USN, vice USNR.

f.       The above changes will entitle the petitioner to a zone “B” SRB with an award level of 2.5 for the IT(2379) rate/NEC.

g.       The 2 month NAVPERS 1070/622 agreement to remain on active duty, signed on or about 24 March 2006, is null and void.

h.       The 19 month NAVPERS 1070/622 agreement to remain on active duty, signed on or about 24 March 2006, is null and void.

i.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.




ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder         Acting Recorder







2
Docket No. 3464-06

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



24 October 2006

W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director








































3

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06794-09

    Original file (06794-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6794-09 21 Jan 10 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO_ Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). g. The 12 month agreement to extend enlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11163-07

    Original file (11163-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    11163-07 20 May 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO-Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify reenlistment contract.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06247-06

    Original file (06247-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leernan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08400-09

    Original file (08400-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    8400-69 20 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/587 dtd 31 Aug 09 (3} Subject’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04289-06

    Original file (04289-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05954-06

    Original file (05954-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05654-06

    Original file (05654-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5654-0631January2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. 5654-06RECOMMENDATION:That Petitioner’s naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10535-06

    Original file (10535-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Leeman, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on •24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05842-06

    Original file (05842-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed nclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the a plicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zon “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06627-07

    Original file (06627-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. Shy, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record....