Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07665-06
Original file (07665-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON
DC 2O37O-5100




CRS
                                                                                 Docket No: 7665-06
7 January 2008









This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of t~t1e 10 of the United Staten Code section J 572

A three-member pane l of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting
application On 12 December 2007, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and Policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 27 November 1995 to 28 June 1996, when you were discharged by reason of homosexuality with an entry level separation.

The Board did not accept your contention to the effect that you were entitled to an honorable discharge because you completed more than 180 days of service. In this regard, the Board noted that an uncharacterjzed entry level separation will be awarded when separation processing is initiated within a service member’s first 180 days of service. Separation processing was initiated in your case on 1 April 1996, which was within your first 180 days of service. As such, you were properly discharged with an entry level separation. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is .regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently when applying for a correction of an official naval record the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.




Sincerely,




W. DEAN PFIEFFER
                                                                        Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07126-98

    Original file (07126-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07849-02

    Original file (07849-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 3 February 1984 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of entry level performance and conduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05357-02

    Original file (05357-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations state that an individual will normally receive an entry level separation during the first 180 days of continuous active military service or the first 180 days after a service break of more than 92 days of active service. You received an RE-3G reenlistment code, which is the most...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3855 14

    Original file (NR3855 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5565 14

    Original file (NR5565 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2015. With regard to your characterization of service, the Board noted that you were notified of your separation process within 180 days of the beginning of your period of active service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05693-09

    Original file (05693-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03055-10

    Original file (03055-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that a reentry code of RE-4 is authorized by regulatory guidance in cases such as yours and is often assigned +o service members...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03902-02

    Original file (03902-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were.reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Boa,rd consisted Board. May 1983 a urinalysis screening was conducted during which you denied any drug abuse and were found not to be drug dependent. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07786-01

    Original file (07786-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. regulations state that separation processing must begin within 180 days and the actual date of separation need not be within 180 You were notified of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08267-07

    Original file (08267-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...