Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07472-06
Original file (07472-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 LCC
Docket No : 0 7472-06
13 Nov 06
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref:    (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      CMC memo 4050.10 LPD-2 of 03 Oct 06
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders that transferred Petitioner to the Fleet Reserve were issued prior to 1 August 2005.
2.       The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.




Docket No. 7472-06
 RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       The orders that transferred Petitioner to the Marine Corps Fleet Reserve were issued on 29 July 2005. Reimbursement for moving the household goods to Rupert, Idaho will not exceed what the cost would have been to the US Government or the amount the Petitioner paid which ever is less.
b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN                                                      WILLIAM J. HESS, III
 Recorder                                                               Acting Recorder
5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the
 Navy.


13 November 2006
                                                                         W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                                        Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01244-06

    Original file (01244-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner reenlisted on 9 October 2005 and was authorized payment of Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Haney, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10361-05

    Original file (10361-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06553-06

    Original file (06553-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06686-06

    Original file (06686-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. 6686-06 CONCLUSIONUpon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.RECOMMENDATION:That...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05386-06

    Original file (05386-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. 5386-06CONCLUSIONUpon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03832-06

    Original file (03832-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAR) at the with-dependent rate for Washington, DC.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations oferror and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00348-08

    Original file (00348-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner requested an extension of the one—year period in which to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense incident to his transfer to the Fleet Reserve effective 31 March 2006.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09138-06

    Original file (09138-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Exnicios and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’ s allegations of error and injustice on 14 December 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They specifically recommended that his lieutenant commander date of rank (and by implication, effective date) be adjusted to 1 October 2005.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06229-06

    Original file (06229-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, ailed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible2. The Board, consisting o~ Messrs. Haney, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07497-06

    Original file (07497-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2O37O~51OOLCCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s...