Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10361-05
Original file (10361-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
                                              WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                             MEH
                                                                                           Docket No. 10361-05
                                                                                          28 FEB 06



From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC memo 1160 4811/100 of 10 Feb 2006
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
 Docket No. 10361-05
 RECOMMENDATION.
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       The reenlistment executed on or about 7 July 2005 is under the provisions of the STAR program; and the Branch/Class (BR/CL) is USN, vice USNR. RADO months are blank, vice 027.
b.       He was advanced to Petty Officer Second Class effective 7 July 2005.
c.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
         
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, I II
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


28 February 2006


         W. DEAN PFEIFFER
          Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09621-05

    Original file (09621-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program upon completion of training.2 The Board consisting ofreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09577-05

    Original file (09577-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01244-06

    Original file (01244-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner reenlisted on 9 October 2005 and was authorized payment of Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Haney, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08980-05

    Original file (08980-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from former spouse to spouse.2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegation of error and injustice on 28 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05386-06

    Original file (05386-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. 5386-06CONCLUSIONUpon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04827-07

    Original file (04827-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a T2A Enlisted Incentive bonus.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 March 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05303-05

    Original file (05303-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfort, Dr. Schultz, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04515-05

    Original file (04515-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100MEHDocket No.04515-05 30 August 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01414-06

    Original file (01414-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 22 June to 30 September 2002 to show a section K.3 (reviewing officer’s comparative assessment”) mark of fourth best of eight possible marks, vice fifth best. As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board has...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07320-05

    Original file (07320-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Dawson, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 September 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...