Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06229-06
Original file (06229-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2O37O-51OO


 LCC
 Docket No. 6229-06
27 Sep 06
From:    Chairman, Board for correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECO D ICO
Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
         
         En cl :    (1)      DD Form 149 w/attachments
                  (2)      NPC memo 1430 Se r 48llE9/ 549 of 31 Aug 06
                  (3)      Subject’s naval r ecord
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, ailed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was adva n ced when first eligible
2.       The Board, consisting o~ Messrs. Haney, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the s u bject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to~ the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideratio n of all the evidence of record, a nd especially in light of the co ntents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustic e warranting the following corrective action.






Docket No. 6229-06
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 June 2006.
b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 7 23.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS III
 Recorder         Acting Recorder
5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



27 September 2006
          W.       DEAN PFEI FFER
         Executive Di rector









2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06229-10

    Original file (06229-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 December 2010 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03259-06

    Original file (03259-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, hat the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant t its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05840-06

    Original file (05840-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07107-06

    Original file (07107-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner‘s allegtions of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the correctiveaction indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03674-06

    Original file (03674-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2037C>5100SRB Docket No: 3674-06 25 Oct 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: Ref. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, hat the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Upon review and consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07607-06

    Original file (07607-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled payment of one-half separation pay when he was discharged from the Marine Corps.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06535-06

    Original file (06535-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06482-06

    Original file (06482-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with •this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Beckett, ~nd Dunn reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05446-06

    Original file (05446-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06328-06

    Original file (06328-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...