Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06513-06
Original file (06513-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5 00


 JRE
 Docket No. 06513-06
2 July 2007



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
The Board found that in order for a service member to be retired by reason of physical disability, he must be unfit to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating because of a disability that was incurred in or aggravated by his service. In those cases where the service member has not completed at least twenty years of active service, the disability must be ratable at 30% or higher to warrant disability retirement.
The Board noted that you complained of being anxious, unhappy and depressed on several occasions during your enlistment, which you attributed to your dissatisfaction with being the Navy. You were not diagnosed as suffering from anxiety or depression, and there is no indication in the available records that you suffered from a significant mental disorder. You underwent a pre-separation physical examination on 14 June 1971, and were found fit for release from active duty. You did not complain of anxiety or depression during the course of the examination, and the physician who conducted the examination reported that the results of a clinical psychiatric evaluation of you were normal. You were honorably released from active duty on July 1971.



A report prepared by R. Weinstein, MD, dated 17 May 2006, indicates that you did not have any adjustment problems while serving in the Navy, and that your “first depression” occurred in 1986. On 17 June 2006, the Department of Veterans Affairs granted you service connection and a 50% rating for bipolar disorder with dissociative disorder effective 18 October 2005.

The fact that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you service connection for a mental disorder more than twenty years after your release from active duty does not demonstrate that you suffered from a diagnosable mental disorder in 1971, or that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability. The Board noted that while the VA must rate any condition it considers “service connected”, that is, incurred in, aggravated by, or merely traceable to, a period of military service, the military departments are permitted to assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit for military service.

In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.


Sincerely,



                                                                        W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                                         Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02955-07

    Original file (02955-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    02955-07 19 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021983

    Original file (20130021983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was discharged due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) with depression and a personality disorder. The VA examiner reported that you had a mental condition (PTSD) prior to service due to stressors you had experienced, particularly the death of friends in a motorcycle accident. The examiner stated that you had symptoms of both PTSD and a personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07559-08

    Original file (07559-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. In a letter dated 29 November 1999, a psychiatrist with a Louisiana State University student health center stated that you had an organic mental disorder with depression and a personality disorder, both secondary to a severe head injury you suffered as a teenager. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00090

    Original file (PD2011-00090.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was also found unfit for dysthymic disorder and ulcerative colitis. PTSD Condition . The Board discussed at length whether ulcerative colitis was permanently service aggravated and subject to rating or existed prior to service as a condition that is known to have exacerbations that are not related to service and thus not eligible for rating.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04596-01

    Original file (04596-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. In this connection, the Board rejected your contentions to the effect that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder at the time of your release from active duty in 1971, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at that time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013872

    Original file (20110013872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was medically retired with a disability rating of at least 50 percent. Counsel states the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army on 2 July 2007 and served honorably until he was administratively discharged for "other designated physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability" in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 5-17. It is a fact-finding board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08920-05

    Original file (08920-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2007. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06493-09

    Original file (06493-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2010. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 14 August 1970, rather than unsuitable for service due to a personality disorder, there is no basis for recommending corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058709C070421

    Original file (2001058709C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did have a slight hearing problem but there is no evidence to show that his hearing loss was disabling or that it affected his duty performance. The PEB also determined that although the applicant had chronic knee pain, his knee was normal according to x-rays and MRI. The evidence of record supports the determination that the applicant's unfitting condition was properly diagnosed and that his 10 percent disability rating for bipolar disorder and his zero percent rating for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00293

    Original file (PD2009-00293.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the mood disorder (major depression, without psychotic features) due to multiple medical conditions as the single unfitting condition, rated 10%; with application of the SECNAVINST 1850.4E and DoDI 1332.39. The Veterans’ Affairs (VA), however, can rate and compensate all service connected conditions without regard to their impact on performance of military duties, including conditions developing after separation that are direct complications of a service...