Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00648-06
Original file (00648-06.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                 MEH
                                                  Docket No. 648-06
                                                  24 January 2006




From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:   Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO


Ref:  (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:  (1) DD Form 149 w/attacliments
       (2) Phonecon w/PSD, Camp Pendleton and Mrs. Harnsberry, BCNR
       (3) Subject’s naval record

1.    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting,
in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to execute an
extension agreement.

2.    The Board, consisting of Messrs,  reviewed Petitioner’s allegations
of error and January 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

3.    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

    a.     Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within
the Department of the Navy.

     b.    In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.

CONCLUS ION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially
in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of
an injustice warranting the following corrective action.







                                                  Docket No. 648-06


RECOMMENDATION:


That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:

     a.    On her EAOS (2 January 2006) she executed a 9 month NAVPERS
1070/621 extension agreement to incur sufficient obligated service for
Bupers Order 2205. This will establish an EAOS of 2 October 2006.

     b.    A copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s
naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.



ROBERT D. ZSALMAN                            WILLIAM HESS III
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the
revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with
its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective
action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



     24 January 2006                         W. DEAN PFIEFFER
                                       Executive Director






















                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03464-06

    Original file (03464-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The 20 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 14 June 2006, is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01342-06

    Original file (01342-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the EN rating. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06572-06

    Original file (06572-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice an 8 year term.2. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06579-06

    Original file (06579-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. Shy, and Ms. McCormick reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04559-06

    Original file (04559-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dunn, Mr. Novello, and Ms. Mann reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 November 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01519-06

    Original file (01519-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messr, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice March 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03607-06

    Original file (03607-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Hicks, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 May 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. The DD Form 4/3, Jan 2001, executed on or about 14 December 2005 is for a term of 4 years, vice 6 years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04766-06

    Original file (04766-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTT(9102) rating/NEC.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05954-06

    Original file (05954-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05842-06

    Original file (05842-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed nclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the a plicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zon “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...