DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SRB
Docket No. 6502-06
4 Oct 06
2
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
3 October 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers
352G of 16 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
DEAN PFEIFF
Executive Direc
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C)
Subj:
R]
as
Se aE
Ref: (a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-31C of 15 Aug 06
(b) Title 38, United States Code, Chapter 30
1. The following is provided in response to reference (a).
Recommend denial 0 fannie: request to enroll in the
Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program. Since .{giiiiiiinend did not
provide substantial evidence to support his claim of
misinformation, there is insufficient reason to recommend
approval of his request. A review of ‘TN aie: master
digital record indicates he disenrolled from the MGIB Program
on 31 July 1987. Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll is
irrevocable. Additionally, members likes ti, who
initially declined MGIB Program enrollment, had a second
Opportunity to enroll during an open enrollment period, which
occurred 1 December 1988 through 30 June 1989. Unfortunately’
" ‘did not enroll in the MGIB Program during either
opportunity.
2. PERS-352G's point of contact is PSC Miller who can be reached
at (DSN) 882-4259 or (C) 901-874-4259.
N =
y songs 4
NA \ OY CLARY VE
A. T. SCHMITT
Head, GI Bill Programs Section
(PERS-352G)
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06715-06
6715-06 4 Oct 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (b)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10859-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 Ser 352/80 dtd 30 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09111-07
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 26 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (c) offered the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program enrollment to active duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08806-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 Pers-352G dtd 14 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07086-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS352G of 19 September 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10578-07
10578-07 22 Jan 08 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your nava1 record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2008. Unless a member brings the MGIB pay problem to the attention of their military pay office, it will go unresolved, either deducting money when the member declined MGIB enrollment or not deducting money when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10478-07
10478-07 22 Jan 08Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1780 PERS-352G of 9 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00401-07
401-07 17 Apr 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 07. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00383-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (b), an individual who was a Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) participant on or before 9 October 1996 and served continuously from that date through at least 1 April 2000 was allowed an opportunity to convert from VEAP to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program. We had other cases of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07053-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS352G of 19 September 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...