Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09310-05
Original file (09310-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 MEH
 Docket No. 9310-05
28 February 2006


This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc
 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NP J memo of 3 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely


                  W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director




Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09709-05

    Original file (09709-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9709-05 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased former spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse’s naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00100-06

    Original file (00100-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    l00—06 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00229-06

    Original file (00229-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NP~ memo of 3 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09941-06

    Original file (09941-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9941-067 February 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06861-09

    Original file (06861-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an , official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08851-06

    Original file (08851-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1700 MRPC dtd 27 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09034-06

    Original file (09034-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9034-06 28 February 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03514-06

    Original file (03514-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 28 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The supporting statements you provided, while commendatory, did not persuade the Board that the contested fitness report was erroneous or unjust. A...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08304-07

    Original file (08304-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 13 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02558-06

    Original file (02558-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2558-06 9 May 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition,...