Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10390-05
Original file (10390-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 MEH
 Docket No. 10390-05
28 February 2006



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the pro v isions of 10 U SC 1552.
A three-member panel of the ~Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/111 of 15 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.


S incerely,


                                                                                          W. DEAN PFEIFFER
 Executive Director


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09419-05

    Original file (09419-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NP~ memo of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10436-05

    Original file (10436-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10436-05 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09310-05

    Original file (09310-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9310-05 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09709-05

    Original file (09709-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9709-05 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased former spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse’s naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00100-06

    Original file (00100-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    l00—06 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00229-06

    Original file (00229-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NP~ memo of 3 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01382-06

    Original file (01382-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    01382-0628 February 2006-This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested that your minimum service obligation be reduced from eight to seven years, or that you be released from active duty effective February 2006. As indicated in the enclosed letter dated 2 February 2006, your case was administratively closed, pending exhaustion of the administrative remedy of submitting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00944-08

    Original file (00944-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 29 February 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08458-10

    Original file (08458-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed the requested modification of the report for 26 July 2006 to 28 February 2007. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02479-06

    Original file (02479-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval RECOTES g sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 27 April 2006, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.