Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09621-05
Original file (09621-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
                                              WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                      MEH
                                                                                           Docket No. 9621-05
                                                                                           28 Feb 2006


From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO
         

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/066
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program upon completion of training.
2 The Board consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.



Docket No. 9621-05



RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       The 2 year reenlistment executed on or about 26 March 2004 is null and void. This will reestablish the previous SEAOS of 16 August
 2005.
b.       The 48 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 26 March 2006, is null and void.
c.       She executed a 24 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on 17 August 2005. This will establish her SEAOS as 17 August 2007.
d.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, II
 Recorder         Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 7 23.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


28 February 2006

                  W. DEAN PFEIFFER
          Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06133-02

    Original file (06133-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel 2 extension agreements. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and injustice on 16 October determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05400-06

    Original file (05400-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with an award level of 1.0 for the OS rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Beckett, and Mr. Dunn, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08400-09

    Original file (08400-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    8400-69 20 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/587 dtd 31 Aug 09 (3} Subject’s naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03464-06

    Original file (03464-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The 20 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 14 June 2006, is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00703-09

    Original file (00703-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify Enlistment/Reenlistment document Armed Forces of the United States. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06627-07

    Original file (06627-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. Shy, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 October 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00644-11

    Original file (00644-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USN vice USNR. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2011...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00013-09

    Original file (00013-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an extension agreement. The Board, consisting of Mr.Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 March 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10771 14

    Original file (NR10771 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board , requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel, and then issue, an agreement to extend enlistment. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05612-06

    Original file (05612-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an extension agreement. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of...