Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06276-06
Original file (06276-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOAIRD FOE COREECT1ON OF NAVAL EECOEDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

HD hd
Docket No. 06276-06
1 March 2007



This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submi t ted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 5 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,


W.       DEAN
 Executive Director

Enclosure

 5420
OPNAV N135
5 OCT 06
MEMORANDUM E’OR  EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2)
Subj:    REQI EST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF
Ref:     (a)      DPNAVINST 6110.1H
         (b)      BCN’. Case File 06276-06

 End:     (1) PRIIIS Record (NAVPERSCOM Official data)
1.       Subject me m ber petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (B( ~R) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and, remove injustices in his service record.
2.       Per enclosure (1) r equests to have his Spring 2005, Phys: ~al Readiness Test (PRT) reflect a non failure
 C ontending he was unable to complete his 1.5 mile run/walk due to a m 3ictl issue.
3.       Recomm end a t ion. Based on the Physical Readiness Program and evidence c on ta i ned in this file, a medical waiver must be provided ii order to change Spring 2005 PRT. No correction will be made to the requested PRIMS records.
4.       This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction N aval Records only. Please contact YN1(AW) /DSN: 882 for further information.


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06804-06

    Original file (06804-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    06804-06 1 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnishedby the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 3 October 2006 with enclosure, a copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07942-06

    Original file (07942-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely,W.DEAN PFEIFFER Executive DirectorEnclosure5420 OPNAV Nl35 20 Nov 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10765-07

    Original file (10765-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10765-07 29 July 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05240-06

    Original file (05240-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    05240-06 1 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2007. DEAN Executive Enclosure5420 OPNAV N151c30 Aug 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2)Subj: RE S FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION$...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09265-06

    Original file (09265-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Recommend no correction be made to the requested PRIMS records.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06376-06

    Original file (06376-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished Consequently, when applying for a correction of anofficialnaval record, theburdenis ontheapplicant todemonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,Enclosure5420 OPNAV N135 3 Oct 06MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2)Subj: REQUEST FOR CO D RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OFRef: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1G(b) BCNR Case File 06376-061. Subject member petitioned...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03304-03

    Original file (03304-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Do not concur with the request to remove the NAVPERS 1070/613 from the record.-equests this action based on his statement that he did not fail any portion of the Spring 2001 PFA cycle. The recommendation to deny Petty Office request to remove the NAVPERS 1070/613s is based on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04978-06

    Original file (04978-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was medically waived from the Fall 2004 PRT cycle. That all Department of the Navy records pertaining to Petitioner be corrected to show that she was medically waived from participation in all elements of the physical readiness test for the Fall 2005 cycle.b. That any material directed to be removed from Subject’ s naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04514-97

    Original file (04514-97.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 19 September and 3 November 1997 and 20 May 1998 with reference (b), copies of which are attached. We cannot determine if the promotion recommendation is in accordance PRT regulations in effect at the time since or if the member could have been recommendation for promotion as it appears the member may have been out of two fitness reports. DSN MSC, USNR, f contact is LCD Pers-601,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01469-06

    Original file (01469-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 10 May 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...