DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC: ddj
Docket No: 3401-02
10 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 10 September 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum
is attached.
1400/3 MMPR 2 of 19 August 2002, a copy of which
Your allegations of error and injustice were
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
,DQZJARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE
a~,.
MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
CORPb
HARRY LEE HALL, 17
LEJEUNE ROAD
QUANTICO,
VIRGINIA 22134-5104
IN REPLY REFER TO.
1400/3
MMPR-2
19 Aug 02
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF MASTER GUNNERY SERGEANT
b-..-
Ref:
(a) DD Form 149
(b) BCNR
(c) MMPR-2
ltr
07 5 Apr 02
ltr CRS Docket No:
1420/2 MMPR-2 dtd 18 Mar 02
.'
03401-02 dtd 8 Apr 02
Per reference (a), Master Gunnery
1.
requested backdate of his master gunnery sergeant
the CY 2001 Sergeant Major through Master Sergeant Selection
Board.
Sergean
has
promotion for
An Enlisted Remedial Selection Board convened 14 August
2 .
2002, considered and did not select Master Gunnery Sergeant
B to master gunnery sergeant for the CY 2001 Sergeant Major
through Master Sergeant Selection Board.
3.
Sergeant
It is the opinion of this section that Master Gunnery
not receive a backdated date of rank.
MaJor, U.S. Marine Corps
Head, Enlisted Promotion Section
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07923-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. board process precludes Sergean based upon a majority vote of the board members, his record was not competitive with the records of the Marines selected for promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06105-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00698-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), Gunnery Sergeant requests promotion to the rank of master sergeant.2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01350-02
Consequently, he was never given the His detaching fitness report was below d. If a response to the adverse fitness report had been on file when the promotion board first reviewed his records for consideration for promotion to gunnery sergeant in CY 2000 his comments and the fitness report would have been reviewed at the same time, enclosure (2). g- The CY 2001 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board convened on 24 April 2001, prior to the date that the Performance Evaluation Review Board reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01138-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 BJG Docket No: 18 January 2002 11X3-01 C RET Dear Master Serg This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. memorandum for the record dated 15 January 2002, Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) will remove from your OMPF the references to your convictions. However, since he has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04454-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01607-07
On April 15, 2005, Petitioner, through counsel, submitted an application to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) seeking removal of the January 1, 2001 to July 7,2Docket No. 01607-072001 fitness report, removal of naval records pertaining to the NJP and a remedial promotion board See enclosure (4)g. Petitioner’s request was bifurcated. Here, Petitioner did not take any action to have his fitness report removed until 15 April 2005, well after the dates of the Selection Boards...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01685-06
In the alternative, you now request new enlisted remedial selection boards (ERSB’s) for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999, 2000 and 2001 master sergeant and first sergeant selection boards.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. The Board found the ~Th’IPR-2 advisory opinion dated 2 August 2006 was correct as to the number of Marines with whom you were compared, despite the indications, in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07773-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400 MMPR 2 of 17 October 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07908-01
opinion furnished by which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of with all subnlitted in support thereof, your naval record and II addition, the Board considered the advisory I I~~~I~~oI-;II~~~~II~~ 140013 MMPR 2 of 13 November 2001, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...