Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06357-06
Original file (06357-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                    2 NAW ANNEX
 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                                             DJC
                                                                                 Docket No. 6357-06
                                                                                 31 October 2006

From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
         Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
En cl :    (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/567 dtd 21 Sep 06
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus
 (SRB).
2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.




Docket No. 6357-06
 RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       The 24 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 5 June 2006, is null and void.
b.       The petitioner was discharged and reenlisted on 3/4 June 2006, vice on or about 2/3 July 2006. The term is 4 years.
c.       This change will entitle the member to a zone “A” SRB with an award level of 3.0 for the FC rate. The petitioner’s SRB should be adjusted from the zone “B” payment received on 3 July 2006 reenlistment.
d.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4.       Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72 3.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. H ESS , III
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5.       Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 7 23.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


31 October 2006


                           W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                           Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06350-06

    Original file (06350-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6350-06 31 October 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj:Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06674-06

    Original file (06674-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04289-06

    Original file (04289-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04766-06

    Original file (04766-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTT(9102) rating/NEC.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05400-06

    Original file (05400-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) with an award level of 1.0 for the OS rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Beckett, and Mr. Dunn, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06261-06

    Original file (06261-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06553-06

    Original file (06553-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bishop, Mr. Haney, and Mr. Ivins, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06247-06

    Original file (06247-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leernan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07022-06

    Original file (07022-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify a reenlistment agreement. The Board, consisting of Mr. Leeman, Ms. McCormick, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 November 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05840-06

    Original file (05840-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...