DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX TRG
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 4451-08
7 January 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 January 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory
Opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which
is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive Dinteac
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1040
MMER/RE
3 May 08
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER
- RRSUBJ: RE-CODE _
Encl: ) NavMC 118 (11)
) Rebuttal to page entry of 28 Apr 05
(1
{2
ts css sven of 3 Aug 06
(4) orm
(4 ccna: DD Form 149 of 5 Aug 06
1. On June 12, 2006, anlage was honorably discharged by reason of
completion of required active service. At the time of separation, mig: -
was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-30, which indicates he would not
extend/reenlist to comply with Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders. A
review of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning his
lackadaisical attitude; duties and responsibilities as a Marine non-
commissioned officer; and not reenlisting/extending to comply with PCS
orders. It is also noted that on April 28, 2005 he signed an official
service record book entry acknowledging assignment of RE-30 reenlistment
code. The reenlistment code assigned by the Marine Corps is an
administrative marking which reflects ‘the member’s acceptability for
reenlistment at the time of separation from the Marine Corps. The code may,
however, be waived at the discretion of the acquiring branch of service per
their own policies and regulations.
2. After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters recommends
that —p~mate ocenlistment code remains RE-30. Once a code is correctly
assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as a result of events that
occur after separation or based on merely on the passage of time.
3. Enclosure (4) is returned for fina
Frances S. Poleto
Head, Performance Evaluation
Review Branch
Personnel Management Division
By the direction of the Commandant
Of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07734-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given your refusal to reenlist.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00716-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06911-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Once a code is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as a result of events that occur after separation or based on merely on the passage of time.4 Enclosure (6) is returned for final actionHead, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11088-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, LyQaas W. DEAN PFE Pxecutive Dareator Enclosure wEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10717-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 15 January 2002 you were honorably discharged by reason of expiration of enlistment and assigned an RE-30 reenlistment code, as directed by CMC. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05209-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04067-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 1999. An RE-30 reenlistment code may be assigned to career Marines who receive PCS orders but refuse to extend or reenlist in order to obtain sufficient obligated service to carry out those orders. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10930 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by revoking his reenlistment code of RE-30 (refused oraers assigned without sufficient obligated service remaining) . f. In enclosure (4), Petitioner contends that his having been assigned the RE-1A reenlistment code justifies removing the contested entry concerning the RE-30 code. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03387-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07621-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Branch, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...