Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05863-05
Original file (05863-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                 .2NAVYANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                      LCC
                                                      Docket No. 5863-05
                                                      19 OCT 05

     From:  Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
     To:    Secretary of the Navy

     Subj:  REVIEW. NAVAL RECORD ICO


     Ref:   (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

     End:   (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
            (2)  Telecon w/representative, Exam Ctr and Ms. Crone, BCNR
            (3)  Subject’s naval record

     1.     Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,
     hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
     Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
     corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.

     2.     The Board, consisting of Messrs  , reviewed Petitioner’s
     allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to
     its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below
     should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary
     material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
     records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

     3.     The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
     to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

         a.      Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
     administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
     within the Department of the Navy.

         b.      In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
     having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
     application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
     warrants favorable action.

     CONCLUS ION

     Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
     especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
     the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
     action.




















                                                    Docket No. 5863-05

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:

     a.     Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-2 effective 3 June 2003
and further corrected to show advanced to paygrade E-3 effective 16 March
2004 and paygrade E-4 effective 16 September 2004.

     b.     A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN      WILLIAM J. HESS,
Recorder    Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the
revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with
its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective
action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.




      19 October 2005

                                        W. DEAN PFIEFFER
                                        Executive Director













                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09434-05

    Original file (09434-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt,Geisler and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07402-05

    Original file (07402-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 03306-05

    Original file (03306-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Haney, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 August 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05695-05

    Original file (05695-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08653-05

    Original file (08653-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08683-05

    Original file (08683-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUS IONUpon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06310-05

    Original file (06310-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs.4pUIIIUU~, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 October 2005 and,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07247-05

    Original file (07247-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08100-05

    Original file (08100-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02570-05

    Original file (02570-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 October 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...