BOA
This is in reference
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
RD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
RDZ:ech
Docket No. 10506-07
22 August 2008
to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuank to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel
Records,
application on 13 Au
injustice were revie
Sitting in executive session,
f
of the Board for Correction of Naval
considered your
ust 2008. Your allegations of error and
ed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary ]
of your application,
support thereof,
material considered by the Board consisted
together with all material submitted in
your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and polities.
After careful and col
record, the Board fo
insufficient to estal
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26 June 1989 at age 18.
11 July 1991 you rec4q
writing a worthless
Corps Exchange.
written warning abou
authorities and were
official statement.
for 21 days of unautl
misconduct you were ]
with an other than hd
nscientious consideration of the entire
hnd that the evidence submitted was
blish the existence of probable material
On
bived nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for
theck in the amount of $219.95 to the Marine
Approximately a month later you received a
t writing worthless checks to civilian
then given a second NUP for making a false
Your third NUP occurred on 16 January 1992
horized absence. Based on your record of
recommended for administrative separation
pnorable (OTH) discharge. When informed of
this recommendation you waived your right to a hearing where you
would have been repr
agreed to accept an
March 1992.
In its review of all
that in view of your
sented by a military lawyer and in effect
TH discharge which was issued to you on 3
the evidence of record the Board concluded
repeated acts of misconduct and willingness
to accept an OTH distharge, your discharge was proper as issued
and should not changed now as a matter of clemency.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members
request.
It is regretted that
that favorable actiol
the Board reconsider
material evidence or
the Board. In this
nh cannot be taken.
The names and
of the panel will be furnished upon
the circumstances of your case are such
You are entitled to have
its decision upon submission of new and
other matter not previously considered by
egard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of reghlarity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
naval record, the bu
existence of probablé«
when applying for a correction of an official
den is on the applicant to demonstrate the
material error or injustice.
h
Sincerely,
LSWoak
W. DEAN PF
Executive D
EF
or
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08405-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an other than honorable (OTH) discharge and elected to have your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02224-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that as a result of your prior period of honorable service, you may be eligible for veterans' benefits. -You may also request that Headquarters Marine Corps (MMSB-10) issue a discharge certificate for your honorable period of service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01577-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12568-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02748-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 January 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is discharged for misconduct and is not recommended for retention.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04035-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 14 April 1994, administrative separation action was initiated by reason of misconduct (drug abuse).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01690-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00258-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01582-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an OTH discharge and elected to have your case heard by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04278-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 March 1992, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a. correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.