Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02070-04
Original file (02070-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
         WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                  MEH:ddj
                  Docket No: 2070-04
                  11 May 2004





Dear:

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 6 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,


W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055.0000
         6        Apr      04

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:    COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION ICO CAPT , USN(RET.), (DECEASED), DOCKET NO. 02070-04
Ref:     (a)      BCNR memo of 16 Mar 04
         (b)      DoD Financial Management Regulation (Volume 7B)

End:     (1) CAPT’s NAVCOMPT Form 2272 dtd 30 Apr 89

1.       Per reference (a) , recommend BCNR not correct CAPT’s record to reflect that he enrolled in the
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.       The recommendation is based on the following:

a.       CAPT transferred to the Retired List on 1 July 1989. He declined participation at that time.

b.       Reference (b) states in part that if a member declines coverage at retirement they are prohibited from participation in the SBP except during an open enrollment period.

c.       The enclosure indicates that Ms. concurred with CAPT’s decision to decline participation in the SBP.

3.       In accordance with reference (b), there are no provisions under public law to provide an SBP annuity to the spouse of a member who is not enrolled.




Program Manager
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)
Survivor Benefits and Entitlements
Branch (PERS-622)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01807-04

    Original file (01807-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1807-04 11 May 2004 This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 . A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01778-04

    Original file (01778-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 6 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In response to reference (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04755-04

    Original file (04755-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 9 July 2004. a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05261-03

    Original file (05261-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. packages explaining the program and offering them an opportunity to enroll in the SBP during the 2 20 September 1973 open season.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06133-03

    Original file (06133-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per .reference (a) , recommend BCNR not correct -record Benefit Plan (SBP).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07533-02

    Original file (07533-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 21 October 2002, a copy of which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03267-06

    Original file (03267-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted that, although he was eligible, your deceased husband had never enrolled in the Reserve component Survivor Benefit Plan after becoming eligible for retirement (without pay). They found that he had received ample opportunity to request retired pay and enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan during the almost 14 years between 8 April 1991 to 18 January 2005. was eligible for retired pay on 8 April 1991.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08651-00

    Original file (08651-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07794-02

    Original file (07794-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s In addition, the Board considered After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. letter from DFAS-CL dated 14 June 1999 which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07590-01

    Original file (07590-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. In response to reference (a), record to reflect that he enrolled in the Survivor lan (SBP) prior to transferring to the Fleet Reserve on recommend BCNR not correct PO1 5 November 1974. Public Law 92-425, which enacted SBP on 21 September 1972, provided that a retiree's participation in SBP at the maximum level was automatic unless...