Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05261-03
Original file (05261-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 5261-03
26 August 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 26 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 3 1 July 2003, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

the-Board reconsider its 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
-You are entitled to have 
neWaiid~ material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

decisionuionsubniission 

%f 

Sincerely,

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT 

OF THE NAV
COMMAND

NAVY 

PERSONNEL 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

Y

31 Jul  03

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

Ref:

(a) BCNR memo of 8 Jul 03
(b) 

DOD Financial Management Regulation (Volume  

7B)

Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct

1.
record to reflect that he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit
(SBP)  
29 February  2000 open enrollment season.

r spouse category coverage,

during the 1 March 1999  to

Plan

2.

The recommendation is based on the following:

transferred to the Fleet Reserve on
e declined participation in the Retired
rotection  Program (RSFPP) at that time.

passed away on   14 May  2003.

b.

Public Law  92-425  of 21 September 1972 established the
Retirees were mailed information
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
packages explaining the program and offering them an opportunity
to enroll in the SBP during the 2
20 September 1973 open season.
opportunity to enroll in SBP during the
30 September 1982, and 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993. He
did not elect to enroll his spouse during any of the above open
seasons.

1 October 1981 through

r 1972 through

was also offered the

-various 

a-speets  of 

"Shift Colors"

(the Navy retirees'

~.information on 

quarterly newsletter)

3.
_provided_~  
SBP~~to~~Incl~ude  the
announcement of the 1 March 1999 to 29 February 2000 open season
enrollment period in the Spring 1999 issue.
included the required form, with instructions,
mail this form to complete enrollment in the
did not use the required form.
received a Retiree Account Statement  
change in his retired pay and at least one annually.
statement identified him as a non-participant in the SBP.

This issue also

(RAS) each time there was a

In addition,

and the address to

This

Subj:

4.
There are no other provisions under federal law, which permit
payment of an SBP annuity to the spouse of a deceased retiree who
did not enroll in this plan.

Program Manager
Survivor Benefit Plan
Retired Activities and GI Bill
Programs Branch (PERS-664)

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02423-02

    Original file (02423-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. He did not elect to enroll his Petty Officer was offered "Shift Colors" (the retirees' quarterly newsletter) regularly 3. provides...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07533-02

    Original file (07533-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse ’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 21 October 2002, a copy of which...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00877-02

    Original file (00877-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Chief Petty enrolled Ms. (SBP) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09563-02

    Original file (09563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This statement identified him as a participant in the SBP Children only coverage, and he took no action to enroll his spouse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01778-04

    Original file (01778-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 6 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In response to reference (a)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03211-07

    Original file (03211-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his current spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)2. A~ditiona1ly, “Shift Colors” (the Navy’s quarterly retiree newsletter) was provided to him and contained information regarding~ the aforementioned

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09997-07

    Original file (09997-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 22 Jan 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07810-02

    Original file (07810-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SCPO Benefit Plan (SBP) using his full retired pay as his base amount prior to transferring to Fleet Reserve. The recommendation is based on the following: a. SCPO transferred to the Fleet Reserve on He enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) 31 August 1980. spouse only coverage category at the minimum base amount of $300.00. The enclosure indicates b. and he had two other opportunities ?had three subsequent opportunities to base amount for the SBP after his The first was during the 1...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05886-08

    Original file (05886-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08663-07

    Original file (08663-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    08663-07 22 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your husband’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on May 19, 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...