Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02064-04
Original file (02064-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

                                                                                 LCC:lc
                                                                                 Docket No: 2026-04
                                                                                 11 May 2004




This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552 .
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OPNAV memorandum 7220 Ser N13OE/04U0288, 22 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,


W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. D.C. 203502000

                                                                                           IN REPLY REFER TO
                                                                                                    7220
                                                                                                   Ser N13OE/04U0288
                                                                                                   22 Apr 04

 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:     Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
Subj:    REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO

Ref:     (a) Joint Federal Travel Regulations, Volume 1
End:     (1) BCNR Case File #02026-04
1.       Per your request, the following recommendation concerning enclosure (1) is provided.
2.       Enclosure (1) indicates a request to be reimbursed for rental car insurance purchased during petitioner’s Temporary Additional Duty (TAD) to San Diego, CA from 2 Dec 03 to 3 Feb 04.
3.       IAW reference (a), paragraph U34l5-C2, The cost of buying collision insurance (e.g., Collision Damage Waiver (CDW) Adjustment, Theft Protection, etc.) is reimbursable only if the insurance is required by the rental agency to provide full coverage insurance but only when renting an automobile in a foreign area or country, or certain classified special operations are involved. Petitioner does not meet the criteria in reference (a)
4.       N13OE recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request for reimbursement of rental car insurance IAW reference (a)



Head, Travel and Transportation
Allowances Section (N13OE)

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02026-04

    Original file (02026-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N13OE recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request for reimbursement of rental car insurance IAW reference...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01763-04

    Original file (01763-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01766-04

    Original file (01766-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00299-09

    Original file (00299-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N130E2/09U0125, a copy of which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates that the petitioner was improperly authorized a rental car while assigned to the ii a> area on an Active Duty Training (ADT) Permanent Change of Station order of over 140 days. Such a change would violate a Comptroller General ruling that PCS orders may not be converted into temporary duty to increase entitlement.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01550-06

    Original file (01550-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N13OE/06U0493, 5 September 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYOFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000 7220 Ser...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02303-01

    Original file (02303-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders reassigning her to the USNS San Jose were modified to include reimbursement of use of rental car while waiting for the USNS San Jose to arrive in Guam. Petitioner must present to the Agency computing the money due a copy of all previous vouchers pertaining to the travel enroute...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09764-02

    Original file (09764-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 9764-02 15 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00244-01

    Original file (00244-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 244-01 16 October 2001 : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy #@+ (a) Title 10 LJ.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N (3) Subject ’s naval record 13OCYO 11JOOS9 of IS February 200 I From To: Ref: Encl : Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07369-00

    Original file (07369-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he is entitled to reimbursement for rental cars while on Temporary Additional Duty (TAD) enroute to his new permanent duty station. In addition, Petitioner is authorized reimbursement of $75.00 for fuel and oil expenses for the total TAD periods. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08054-07

    Original file (08054-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement for travel of his spouse to Guam, payment of Temporary Lodging Allowance (TLA), and Dislocation Allowance (DLA) with dependents.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...