NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07687-00
The Board, consisting of Ms. Moidel and Messrs. Carlsen and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board notes that Petitioner had an excellent career in the Navy for many years, that his decline in performance may have been related...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01685-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged by reason of Secretarial Authority and assigned a reentry code (RE code) of RE-I, or in the alternative, that he was honorably discharged and assigned an RE code of RE-3G. He submits evidence of his good post service conduct and achievements, and a report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09299-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlistment member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that the record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 24 August 2001 but served on active duty and service on active duty until the completion of his enlistment. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3G or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Given the...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2001-111
1995), in determining whether it is in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations, the Board must consider the reasons for the applicant’s delay and “make a cursory review of the potential merits of the claim.” In this case, he argued, the Board should deny the request for untimeliness because the applicant “has failed to offer substantial evidence that the Coast Guard committed either an error or injustice by not referring his case to a physical evaluation board.” The Chief...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-211
However, a cursory review of the merits of the application indicates that the Coast Guard committed an error by listing JFX (personality disorder) as the separation code, unsuitability as the narrative reason for separation, and RE-4 as the reenlistment code on the applicant’s DD214. It was error for the Coast Guard to describe the applicant’s discharge based on a diagnosis of separation anxiety disorder as a personality disorder. In light of the above findings, the Board finds that it is...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00529
The CI’s reported minimum weight was 96% of the minimum expected weight based on the minimum normal BMI and remained above 85% of the MLIC desirable weight (133.5 pounds). Other than anorexia nervosa, no other ratable mental conditions were forwarded to the PEB for adjudication by the MEB psychiatry evaluation. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04437-01
discharged on 20 July 1999 by reason of erroneous entry and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. court- Thereafter, the discharge authority You were so The doctor's statement does not challenge Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to an individual separation by reason of a erroneous enlistment. situational anxiety suggests that the unique stresses of military service could easily exacerbate this problem.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08335-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, changes in his reason for separation and reenlistment code. In support of that request, he submitted the 1999 psychological assessment. However, in 1995, while in the navy, Petitioner's records do support the in-service diagnosis of personality disorder for the reasons noted above.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03351
Whether the applicant’s symptoms in the months prior to entering active duty were of such character or severity that would have warranted reporting by the applicant cannot be clearly determined from the available evidence, but evidence does suggest that onset of clinically significant symptoms occurred following entry onto active duty. Upon this review, the Board will find that absolutely no evidence of any mental health conditions existed prior to signing the AFHPSP contact on August 29,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016775
It was the opinion of this examiner that discharging the member from the Army in accordance with paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), is in the best interests of both the individual and the Army. The separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, due to a personality disorder and directed that the applicant receive an honorable discharge. Evaluations revealed no current anxiety symptoms,...