Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05209-06
Original file (05209-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW
Docket No: 5209-06
4 October 2006

 

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 October 2006. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps Performance
Evaluation Review Branch, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board especially noted
the counseling entry of 16 April 2004. Therefore, the Board

substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. -The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

 

Enclosure
(1) Advisory Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO:

1040

ER/RE
08 2006

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

fr

 

Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER
a HE SUBT: RECODE

 
 

 

 

Encl; (1) NAVMC 118(11l)a
(2) NAVMC 118(11)b
(3) NAVMC 118(11)d of 20 Aug 03
(4) NAVMC 118(11)e of 16 Apr 04
(5) nee OD Form 149 of 12 Dec 05
1. service record has been reviewed and it has

  
 

been ‘determined that at the time of separation he was assigned a
reenlistment code of RE-4, which means that he was not
recommended for reenlistment. The reenlistment code was
correctly assigned and was based on his overall record.

2. Wiiime was honorably discharged on December 10, 2004 by
reason of non retention on active duty. A review of his service
record indicates that he was counseled concerning failure to
operate a privately owned vehicle in a safe manner; not being
recommended for promotion; unprofessional conduct; inability to
perform multiple activities inherent to a Marine; failure to make
satisfactory progress while assigned to weight control; financial
irresponsibility; insubordinate conduct toward a noncommissioned
ofticer; and unauthorized absence. Enclosures (1) through (4)
pertain.

3. After a review of all relevant information, this Headquarters
concurs in the professional evaluation of@]_Res qualifi-
cations for reenlistment at the time of separation. Once a code
is correctly assigned it is not routinely changed or upgraded as
a result of events that occur after separation or based merely

on the passage of time.

 

    

4. Enclosure (5) is returned for final action.
yf A
snaeae, = : od /. af
ly?” TERRY

\ Head, Performance Evalyation

\geview Branch f
Pe nel Management’ Division

By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05415-06

    Original file (05415-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05186-06

    Original file (05186-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05928-06

    Original file (05928-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06961-06

    Original file (06961-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 1 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02448-06

    Original file (02448-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A minimum average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08064-06

    Original file (08064-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 31 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07561-06

    Original file (07561-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 1 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. XXXXX service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that his reenlistment code of RE-3C was correctly assigned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06976-06

    Original file (06976-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 1 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06138-06

    Original file (06138-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100 CRSDocket No: 6138-0621 September 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board f or Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07814-06

    Original file (07814-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 7814-068 November 2006This is in reference to our application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 155A three-member panel of he Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record...